*douche
Can we realise this dream? Is it possible? I've been seeing a lot of *douche-worthy clips lately.
I think it'd be a very valid, quality channel to have added to the sift.
Can we realise this dream? Is it possible? I've been seeing a lot of *douche-worthy clips lately.
I think it'd be a very valid, quality channel to have added to the sift.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
17 Comments
Oh man... this has to happen. Pop the collar and the natural ice, and START TAGGING!
Well, you're less than 100 stars away from your own channel. Get to work!
>> ^Sarzy:
Well, you're less than 100 stars away from your own channel. Get to work!
Yeah, I was gonna say I'd make it if no one else does by the time I'm able to, but upon viewing the FAQ, it appears that I might have a lot more work to do than I thought:
A Sifter may create their own channel upon reaching Bronze Diamond level. (See above.)
But there is no Bronze Diamond! Madness! Madness I tell you.
Ah, wait:
Ruby Member and Diamond Member (250 Stars), (500 Stars)
* May create, stylize, and run a video channel (my_topic.videosift.com)
Weird. Anyways, that's good to know. If someone doesn't make it before me, *douche shall be mine!
But bear in mind I am not qualified to be the creator of this channel. We need a real douche in charge.
Any suggestions, folks? If someone else can do it, the sooner the better.
[redacted]
^ spammers are the biggest douches of all
Hmm I wonder if they'd even allow a douche channel? Might be a bit subjective.
You should ask before you get your hopes up mate, see if it's possible? I'd sign the petition! Tagging things *douche would give me something to do while I look for a job
I hate to be a party-pooper, but.. seriously? Are you for reals?
You must've not looked - as of today there are only 70 videos named/tagged with "douche" (http://www.videosift.com/search?q=douche) - it might be a little subjective, but my opinion is that it's nowhere near enough to warrant the creation separate channel. Hell - me, I thought a 1500+ might not be enough when I searched for my first choice of a channel to create. And that's not going into the subjectivity of making a decision who's a douche as well as the ambiguity of the term itself.
Douche is not subjective... popped collar = douche
As for the number of videos tagged douche already, I feel that few are going to tag it without a channel. I for one didn't know there was any point in doing so without a channel so have refrained from really tagging...
Well this is amazing and i agree that you are for away from it.
>> ^EDD:
I hate to be a party-pooper, but.. seriously? Are you for reals?
You must've not looked - as of today there are only 70 videos named/tagged with "douche" (http://www.videosift.com/search?q=douche) - it might be a little subjective, but my opinion is that it's nowhere near enough to warrant the creation separate channel. Hell - me, I thought a 1500+ might not be enough when I searched for my first choice of a channel to create. And that's not going into the subjectivity of making a decision who's a douche as well as the ambiguity of the term itself.
I am seriously for reals!
70 tagged so far, with some remaining to be, and many more not yet even sifted! And then ponce's point: As for the number of videos tagged douche already, I feel that few are going to tag it without a channel.
We have to face the reality that in this world today, there are many douches. The douche-levels are rising rapidly. We see the effects of douche almost everywhere, and no where moreso than on the internets.
There are 492 videos in the Comics channel, 481 in Islam, and 311 in Grindhouse. I think *douche could surpass at least 500.
Do we really need to fill the Sift with doucheburgers, though? Can't we just leave them at http://www.hotchickswithdouchebags.com/ and pretend that they don't exist?
I see your point, dear direpickle, but I would argue that douchebaggery is hard to ignore, and is ever prevalent in today's society. I wouldn't commend finding videos of non-comedic douchebaggery. If it doesn't provide some good old schadenfreudey humorous fun, it shouldn't be sifted. Don't tag a video with some dude or band you don't like as douche. It has to be blatant douchebaggery. A perfect example would be my recent 'street justice' sift.
a douchebag channel should have a specific description. (See: The Gotti Family) It would serve to amuse me at all hours of the day. BTW... girls can be douche bags too. I never think to tag vids with "Douche" or the like.... but if I had a channel to remind me I would be more inclined to do so.
*discard
Discarding this post - discard requested by original submitter EndAll.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.