This has to be a bit. He could have easily informed her that the title of the show was "you". I think many of us just love the idea that everyone at Fox is an idiot.

I think “there’s a show called “you” on Netflix WAS informing her the title of the show was “you”, and she knows damn well her show is not on Netflix.

The problem is they’re not JUST idiots (proven time and time again, not just here) they’re insanely narcissistic, so even when you say “not you, a show called “you” on a network you aren’t on” they think “he’s talking about me and my show”.

Kinda a Q: “who’s on first”…A: ”so Laura Ingraham is on first?”

After he said the show was on "you" three or four separate times, which makes all the difference. I'd buy it if he would have led with that, and why wouldn't you if you can see the confusion? I'm sticking with it being a bit.

There’s also that bit where “it’s on you” in no way means “it’s on YOUR show”. Should have been a hint to anyone who speaks non-pigeon-English. I thought he thought she just misheard, so he repeated.

But expecting Fox talking heads to understand plain English gives them too much credit. Edit: actually, expecting them to stop talking long enough to hear the answers to their questions is expecting too much. I think if she had listened, she would have understood.

I wish I could convince myself it was a bit, but I feel Laura isn’t that good of an actor, and her demeanor indicates she was being serious. I don’t want to think professional people are that clueless, but experience has made me believe they really are….but I freely admit it’s just my biased opinion…you of course are welcome to your own less jaded opinion, and I’ll just hope I’m wrong.

my screw up. posted w/o mentioning...

...wanted to fix it 'tho. didn't know how. the proof reading isn't strong in this one.

*news *talks

Adding video to channels (News, Talks) - requested by ant.

Ewe.