War Profiteer Raytheon Cashing In On Syria Already

Defense contractor, Raytheon is already seeing a huge stock jump at the prospects of launching Tomahawk missiles (which the defense giant produces) into Syria.
bcglorfsays...

And while the sift embraces this as fact, it still demands to see the evidence that Russian and Iranian made weapons have been used by Assad against his own people for the last how long?

Stormsingersays...

What exactly are you claiming is incorrect in this report? Anything?

bcglorfsaid:

And while the sift embraces this as fact, it still demands to see the evidence that Russian and Iranian made weapons have been used by Assad against his own people for the last how long?

bcglorfsays...

Nothing.

I am observing the same crowd that protests the loudest about giving Assad the benefit of the doubt is the same one tripping over itself to lay blame for every possible wrong at American feet.

The following seems to he the mentality, and I cringe inside at the horror of it:

Did you know that Americans helped Saddam use chemical weapons against Iran? Evil!
Did you know that Americans ignored Saddam when he used chemical weapons against the Kurds? Evil!
Did you know that Americans removed Saddam from power? Evil!
Did you know that Americans are thinking of launching military actions against Syria? Evil!
Did you know that Assad's forces used chemical weapons against his own people? Prove it, there is no evidence to show it, propaganda!!!!

Stormsingersaid:

What exactly are you claiming is incorrect in this report? Anything?

enochsays...

@bcglorf

coming from the sifter who states,and i quote:
"Oh, and he thinks the Iraq "problem" was created by America in the last decade. America's role started with support for Saddam, and from there 99% of the "problem" with Iraq needs be laid at Saddams feet for the decades of brutal repression destruction of Iraqi society that he committed. All that damage had everything to do with how horrific and ugly Iraq is today."

i think maybe you should do a bit of research before you throw broad generalizations out there.
i.e: how the sift embraces something.what are we? borg?

so you choose this thread to continue your berating of people who happen to disagree with you.

so let me be clear.
all those examples in your incomplete list are proven facts.
F.A.C.T.S
there is NO concrete evidence assad's regime is responsible.
there is suspicion.
some information implicates.
but to use the 2003 bush administration jargon,there is no smoking gun that led to a mushroom cloud.

and here we are 10 years later.
6 million displaced.
over a half million dead.
a culture practically destroyed.
a population in tatters and government ineffectual.
all based on a LIE.

so those of us suggesting non-intervention or diplomacy are assholes?

look at what YOU are suggesting!
bomb bomb bomb

so let me ask YOU.
what do you think bombing syria will do?

*edit-and who the fuck is giving assad the "benefit of the doubt"? so because people are being cautious in a complicated issue all of sudden they are fans of a brutal dictator?
fucking seriously?

bcglorfsays...

Yes, insisting that diplomacy is likely to stop Assad's continued campaign of murdering his own people is a problem for me. Sure, maybe I should just accept it as naive and not malicious, but people are being killed while the world stands around yet again refusing to do anything, and that makes me angry.

I'm not trying to whitewash America's role in Iraq either. If anything I'd say my picture is a lot blacker than the people I disagree with the most. The only point I think I differ on is that I DO hold Saddam even more responsible for what he did than America or Saudi Arabia or any of his other backers. I see no reason to apologize for that. Read up on Saddam's Al Anfal campaign against the Kurds, his gassing of Kurdish villages was the least of the atrocities he committed against the Kurds. Saddam had been destroying everything in Iraq the entire time he was in power, from the absolute repression that was everyday life, to the endless feeding of Iraqi bodies to into the Iran-Iraq war, to the genocide of the Kurds, to the genocide of the Shia, Saddam had killed millions of Iraqis and systematically orchestrated and encouraged sectarian hatred and divisions. All that time America continued to callously back him because America was happy to see Iraq and Iran bleed themselves out against each other. If I find some solace in finally, at long last seeing America change it's tune and finally opposing Saddam it's not for because I think America is some humanitarian entity. You list all the devastation in Iraq since the American invasion, but just what realistic alternative version of Iraq do you see could exist today if non-intervention had been held to? Iraq today would STILL be under Saddam's control today, and I would insist anyone wanting that alternative doesn't know what Saddam really was like. I also insist it must be known that the Iraqi people were NOT going to manage to liberate themselves without foreign intervention. The Kurds contemplated it once, and it ended in a campaign of genocide and systematic rape to breed the Kurds out of existence. The Shia tried it once, and it ended in genocide for them too. The Iraqi people knew exactly how opposition to Saddam ended and it was NOT going to happen without someone coming in from outside.

Maybe I just see the world as that much more awful and horrific a place. Just because things are bad and horrific doesn't mean they couldn't be a far sight worse, and in fact haven't been a far sight worse in the recent past.

I don't object to demands for caution and concern that getting involved in a conflict can lead it escalate. I object to defending dictators with impossible barriers and burdens of proof. The fact the UN teams have trouble getting evidence shouldn't be touted as reason to question Assad's involvement when he steadily interferes and endeavors to hinder the UN investigations. If we require concrete evidence before declaring Assad guilty, and Assad refuses the UN access until they have concrete evidence a problem has arisen, no?

bobknight33jokingly says...

Your work for money, You desire money. Hell there is someone more deserving than you for your job that your greedily hold on to. Someone who needs the money a little bit more that you. Right?


And you say "Fuck peoples lives when there is money to be made"

Your are the pot calling the kettle black

No bombs have bee dropped and the stock is up. They are not hurting anyone, Raytheon does not kill people. Governments do.

Yogisaid:

Fuck peoples lives when there's money to be made right?

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More