Damn, I'm too late again.
*promote

Edit: More info here

Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Wednesday, May 2nd, 2012 10:44am PDT - promote requested by dingens.

I think it's also worth asking..,
"Did no one notice him missing when he didn't show up for classes for almost a week?" No one went looking for him, not one family member noticed?

*law fail

Adding video to channels (Law) - requested by rottenseed.

I wonder how Bradley Manning is doing.

Just a note to all:
If you are ever starving and find some speed DO NOT take it.
That's probably why his kidneys were failing.

It will be interesting to hear what their excuse for this is.

>> ^00Scud00:

It will be interesting to hear what their excuse for this is.


I really doubt even the DEA would try to claim it's excusable or understandable.

More likely, now that it's public they'll express "regret" without apologizing properly, and someone will get a slap on the wrist corrective action or paid temporary suspension.

This won't be a cheap mistake.

They Ignored him. They didn't forget him, apparently staff and other kidnap victims could hear him. He was ignored not forgotten.

War on Drugs = War on Freedom

War on Freedom = Terrorism

DEA = Terrorists.


See how easy? Also hilarious, this pot user ends up introduced to Meth by the DEA, forcefully.

Any more absurdity and I'm going to have to pay an insane amount of money to be educated WHY this system is a failure. Oh.... dang....

bradley manning didnt get any speed.

The same thing happened to me -- waiting on line at the DMV

>> ^jonny:

"he spent in a 5 ft. by 10 ft. cell, where he could not spread his arms out wide."
How long are this dude's arms?!?!


He was handcuffed. Odd wording but it's the only explanation.

All they seized were some soft drugs - shrooms, weed, ecstacy, some other crap and "some weapons" ie. various things that you'd find in a normal house that can be used to fluff out the report and make sure such drugs are associated with violence!

Someone remind me again what's so terrible about taking those things in the privacy of your own property?

>> ^dannym3141:

>> ^jonny:
"he spent in a 5 ft. by 10 ft. cell, where he could not spread his arms out wide."
How long are this dude's arms?!?!

He was handcuffed. Odd wording but it's the only explanation.
All they seized were some soft drugs - shrooms, weed, ecstacy, some other crap and "some weapons" ie. various things that you'd find in a normal house that can be used to fluff out the report and make sure such drugs are associated with violence!
Someone remind me again what's so terrible about taking those things in the privacy of your own property?


Here's a more recent CNN story.

Yes, he was handcuffed in the cell. The house that was raided seemed to be an MDMA distribution center, and the DEA claims they seized 18,000 pills, as well as several guns and cases of ammo. But it also wasn't the kids house; it seems he was just there with friends to get high. Which is why he wasn't charged and supposed to be released.

>> ^entr0py:

>> ^dannym3141:
>> ^jonny:
"he spent in a 5 ft. by 10 ft. cell, where he could not spread his arms out wide."
How long are this dude's arms?!?!

He was handcuffed. Odd wording but it's the only explanation.
All they seized were some soft drugs - shrooms, weed, ecstacy, some other crap and "some weapons" ie. various things that you'd find in a normal house that can be used to fluff out the report and make sure such drugs are associated with violence!
Someone remind me again what's so terrible about taking those things in the privacy of your own property?

Here's a more recent CNN story.
Yes, he was handcuffed in the cell. The house that was raided seemed to be an MDMA distribution center, and the DEA claims they seized 18,000 pills, as well as several guns and cases of ammo. But it also wasn't the kids house; it seems he was just there with friends to get high. Which is why he wasn't charged and supposed to be released.


I'm glad there's a company line being towed on why an innocent person nearly died thanks to the war on drugs

Man if that is true I am even more upset with the DEA. If you were going to be fair dealers should not be in trouble as much as users because dealers are further removed from any supposed harm and don't actually cause any harm at all.

>> ^entr0py:

>> ^dannym3141:
>> ^jonny:
"he spent in a 5 ft. by 10 ft. cell, where he could not spread his arms out wide."
How long are this dude's arms?!?!

He was handcuffed. Odd wording but it's the only explanation.
All they seized were some soft drugs - shrooms, weed, ecstacy, some other crap and "some weapons" ie. various things that you'd find in a normal house that can be used to fluff out the report and make sure such drugs are associated with violence!
Someone remind me again what's so terrible about taking those things in the privacy of your own property?

Here's a more recent CNN story.
Yes, he was handcuffed in the cell. The house that was raided seemed to be an MDMA distribution center, and the DEA claims they seized 18,000 pills, as well as several guns and cases of ammo. But it also wasn't the kids house; it seems he was just there with friends to get high. Which is why he wasn't charged and supposed to be released.

Is this dead? I don't see a video, just white space where the embed should be.

It was indeed dead, those bums changed the embed code. Fixed it for the time being.>> ^jimnms:

Is this dead? I don't see a video, just white space where the embed should be.