*promote

Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Sunday, September 9th, 2012 7:19am PDT - promote requested by Hybrid.

Dag wood test anyone?

That water must be Cold!

*documentaries

Adding video to channels (Documentaries) - requested by Boise_Lib.

If the bicycle commercial stays, I don't see how anyone can object to this one.

And ick...a smoker.

wtf @pumkinandstorm, what's with the nude videos all of a sudden? This, like the bike one, has nothing going for it other than attractive naked women. As such, shouldn't really be here. There are thousands of places on the internet to go to for porn and erotica and nudity for the sake of it, why does the sift have to have it to?

I for one vote to remove this... should it be discussed also?

@dag? thoughts.

What's the bike thing? I wish to disapprove of it.

Edit - found it, saw it: porn.

I better add it to my archive for further "analysis".

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

*discuss. I think this might need to go. Dissenting opinions?

The vast Internet is your porn enchilada.

This video is being sent to Sift Talk for discussion - discuss requested by dag.

Porn?? Really??

Sift of the week!

*art

Adding video to channels (Art) - requested by MrFisk.

This is definitiely not porn as I understand porn.

For arguing purposes here again, THOSE rules:

"VideoSift does not allow videos containing explicit sexual content. If such a video is submitted, it will be promptly removed and the submitter may be subject to a temporary or permanent ban.

"Explicit sexual content" is defined on VideoSift as gratuitous nudity of a sexual nature lacking any reasonable artistic and educational merit, implying its sole intent is to cause sexual arousal."

It's not solely about porn. It's about content. As the title says: "Whiteleys Sexiest Moments" I vote for removing this.

>> ^dingens:

Dag wood test anyone?


The part of dag's wood I have here says:

...
Made in China. Huh.

>> ^luxury_pie:

>> ^dingens:
Dag wood test anyone?

The part of dag's wood I have here says:
...
Made in China. Huh.


Kinky.

It's a bit pervy this kind of film where they show themselves filming the model of whom they are taking photographs.

That's mainly why I wouldn't vote of it. It's nice for her that she's got splendid knockers but other than that I don't see it as siftworthy and I haven't voted for it.

My vote would be to remove.

BTW I had to laugh as I've just come home from work and eagerly clicked on ST to see what had happened to the bike video and then saw pumpkinandstorm's *other* video here.

If this were more about "Behind the scenes of a photo shoot" or something, perhaps I'd be more inclined to say it can stay, but as @luxury_pie pointed out, it's described solely as "sexy moments," which means the video's "sole intent is to cause sexual arousal."

I wouldn't really call it porn, but we're censoring more than porn on videosift, so eh. The bike video was closer to porn than this, and I didn't think that was removal worthy either.

Really not a fan of these kind of videos, pumkin. Sorry.

I appreciate that you changed the thumbnail on the vid -- wish there was some way to change the still image when you click on it to watch.

If a guy posted these vids, I would be just as uncomfortable.

You are such a good sifter, sweetpea. But I concur with @spoco2. Why these lowest really common denominator vids all of a sudden? I don't get it.

You know I adore you. I just don't like these and will be just as happy if @dag kills them.

*kill

Permanently discarding this video - kill requested by pumkinandstorm.