For Miss Informer of the Year: 2009, may I nominate Rachel Maddow?

And on a side note, good God, has his show only be on Fox since January? Such a prolific output of spittle in such a short time.

^You certainly mean Sarah Palin. Unless you really do have your head so far up Glenn Beck's arse that you're beginning to believe his bullshit.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'media matters, glenn beck, crazy, liar, mccarthyism' to 'media matters, glenn beck, crazy, liar, mccarthyism, silver gopher' - edited by peggedbea

>> ^Trancecoach:
^You certainly mean Sarah Palin. Unless you really do have your head so far up Glenn Beck's arse that you're beginning to believe his bullshit.


Miss Informer of the Year would be a positive award.

It's obvious this guy was and is a repressed obnoxious geek that probably got his little obnoxious geek ass kicked and poked throughout his life and now he has to keep flapping his big stupid gums to make some point based on fact-less contortions of reality so some idiotic people idolize him. Nothing he says makes any sense whatsoever and it never will. He put up nazi's marching but in reality it fits his show so perfectly with nazi's while he speaks lies and manipulations to the seriously mentally challenged and ill masses.

He should have won for satirist of the year, except that it would have let his audience in on the joke.

"We told you this was going on, without proof."

Came across his children's Christmas Book at the store yesterday - W T F. Get 'em young, eh...

Trancecoach, just go read rosser99's post again will ya? It's ok, everyone makes mistakes, you just have to man up to it.

>> ^Trancecoach:
^You certainly mean Sarah Palin. Unless you really do have your head so far up Glenn Beck's arse that you're beginning to believe his bullshit.


People have tried to show you this without pointing it out very clearly. I'm only pointing it out, because I was like you and didn't understand it at first.

>> ^rosser99:
For Miss Informer of the Year: 2009, may I nominate Rachel Maddow?


And the title of the video:

Misinformer of the Year 2009

Is that any clearer?

Whatever happened to Bill O'Reilly???

>> ^rottenseed:
Whatever happened to Bill O'Reilly???


Only mildy crazy and assholish compared to Beck.

I believe the correct term should actually be "disinformer." Misinforming is spreading information that is unintentionally false, or information one might believe to be true, whereas Disinformation is false or misleading information that is spread deliberately. To say that Glenn Beck misinforms is to grant him more charity than he deserves.

Oh look. It's a leftwing progressive group masquerading as a non-partisan information source that get's it's funding from a 427. And people still believe this stuff instead of thinking for themselves, amazing.

^ Unfortunately not every group can be "fair and balanced".

Maybe if they put "unbiased" in their name then more conservatives would trust them.

Always good to start out with the belief in someones political philosophy. Stay classy. Just a FYI, I'm conservative-libertarian which means I'm still further to the left then most of you in the US. The fact that they have a more annoying bias then fox's opinion shows is what should be getting to people. Not only that, but they when they attack fox for something yet pull the same tricks they're called to account by no one yet receive glowing praise for it? I'm not sure how much more hypocrisy one could take on that.

But common sense which isn't so common is an amazing thing to dissect. That people have such an unmitigated hate on they can't see they're being mislead by another group in the same clothing, is what I find very interesting. Well that and they can't figure out the difference between News and Opinion. >> ^Psychologic:
^ Unfortunately not every group can be "fair and balanced".
Maybe if they put "unbiased" in their name then more conservatives would trust them.