Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
7 Comments
CrushBugsays...Well, I pretty much squirmed through that entire video.
olyar15says...This is pure BS. Typical "liberal" misleading propaganda.
harlequinnsays...Good video. But...
"The speed of an assault weapon is substantially higher than the speed of a handgun".
No. The velocity of the projectile from a centerfire rifle is generally much higher than that of a centerfire pistol. It does not matter if the rifle is semi-automatic or not. The velocity of the projectile from a rimfire rifle is also generally much higher than that of a centerfire pistol. But rimfire rifles have very low projectile weights and deliver substantially less energy, have substantially less momentum, have generally smaller projectile diameters, and hence are much less lethal than centerfire pistols.
Some projectiles are designed to tumble. Most projectiles for disrupting flesh are designed to flatten out (and not fragment).
newtboysays...Rimfire is typically .22 and smaller, definitely not for assault weapons.
Data:
http://wredlich.com/ny/2013/01/projectiles-muzzle-energy-stopping-power/
Edit: now I see, you misquoted them. I just now had a chance to watch the video and had replied based solely on your misquote in your comment. You're correct that single shot, semi auto, and full auto have nothing to do with projectile speed, but including rimfire ammo is misleading.
Good video. But...
"The speed of an assault weapon is substantially higher than the speed of a handgun".
No. The velocity of the projectile from a centerfire rifle is generally much higher than that of a centerfire pistol. It does not matter if the rifle is semi-automatic or not. The velocity of the projectile from a rimfire rifle is also generally much higher than that of a centerfire pistol. But rimfire rifles have very low projectile weights and deliver substantially less energy, have substantially less momentum, have generally smaller projectile diameters, and hence are much less lethal than centerfire pistols.
Some projectiles are designed to tumble. Most projectiles for disrupting flesh are designed to flatten out (and not fragment).
harlequinnsays...Ah no. I didn't misquote this.
Go to the 16 second mark thank you very much.
Including rimfire was to point out that just because it is a rifle doesn't mean it is more powerful than a handgun.
Rimfire is typically .22 and smaller, definitely not for assault weapons.
Data:
http://wredlich.com/ny/2013/01/projectiles-muzzle-energy-stopping-power/
Edit: now I see, you misquoted them. I just now had a chance to watch the video and had replied based solely on your misquote in your comment. You're correct that single shot, semi auto, and full auto have nothing to do with projectile speed, but including rimfire ammo is misleading.
bobknight33says...I've always thought Assault-style rifles are just rifles.. no more no less... Just looks like it belongs to a soldier.
This video suggests that assault-style rifles are worse than hand guns.. Not necessary is the AR15 more deadly than a 9MM or 357?
Would think mass and velocity / distance are the key things to think about when doing damage to a body.
I don't own a weapon and never did.
newtboysays...Ok, then rimfire isn't assault weapon ammo. You're mixing up topics, adding confusion for nothing on topic....
....and the data massively contradicts your contention that any normal handgun is more powerful or faster than assault weapons, which are 7.62x39 and .223, both over 3 times the power of .357 magnums and beat .44 magnums handily.
To be honest, .50 AE pistols do actually appear to have slightly more power than .223 caliber rifles, I had to look them up separately as they weren't listed, but they are far slower, and a .50 cal bmg has around 7.5 times more power, and desert eagles in the AE .50 configuration aren't normal pistols.
Ah no. I didn't misquote this.
Go to the 16 second mark thank you very much.
Including rimfire was to point out that just because it is a rifle doesn't mean it is more powerful than a handgun.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.