Video Flagged Dead

Fred Phelps fined 11 Million, throws hissy fit

Albert Snyder of York, Pa., the father of a Westminster Marine who was killed in Iraq, today won his case in a Baltimore federal court against members of Topeka, Kan.-based Westboro Baptist Church who protested at his son's funeral last year.

Mr. Snyder has been awarded $10.9 million dollars.

Rick Sanchez takes on the crazy Fred Phelps, founder of the Westboro cult, video:

This video deserves its own post though of Fred Phelps having himself a hissy at Rick Sanchez because he lost the lawsuit.

Poor thing sounds upset. Not half as upset as the poor families that try to bury their family members in peace just have this insane cult leaders disrupt the funerals and turn them into a circus.
RadHazGsays...

ah religion. self inflicted mild insanity. gotta love how some folks can look at the bible and pick out individual bits and use them for their own agenda. i'm willing to bet these same crackpots who hate gays, conveniently ignore the verse about stoning a lazy/disobedient child to death. or anyone who works on Saturday for that matter.

"hmm. that looks nice, i think we'll support this idea, but those idea's are just plain nuts! to crazy for us no thanks. we don't want those idea's no sir. but we'll keep them in the bible for sentimental reasons."

Kevlarsays...

Scum.

Phelps' mob was in town a few days after the Station Nightclub fire in Rhode Island, protesting the burned husk of a building and the makeshift memorial to mark where 100 died. Cops were also in attendance to allow them to protest. From what I could see as we drove by (they caused a traffic jam), it was ok for them to hold up their signs declaring 'America is doomed' and full of 'fags', and to shout down anyone within 20 feet or even passing by the display on the road, but the cops were pretty testy about anyone getting close to or responding to them. That was a sad day, especially as they were allowed to exercise their full rights while others were discouraged from response for fear of inciting violence.

jwraysays...

They're trying to out-Fox Fox by treating a guest like that. This reporter went to the Bill O'Reilly school of interviewing. Even when you're interviewing a total nutjob, don't act like O'Reilly!

The verdict may violate the first amendment, regardless of how ignorant and insane the Phelps family is.

jwraysays...

"[Shirley Phelps-Roper" was arrested on June 5th, 2007 on suspicion of contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Police alleged that she allowed her son to trample an American flag while protesting the funeral of a soldier in Bellevue, Nebraska, which is a misdemeanor in the state.[5] Phelps-Roper has announced her intent to challenge the constitutionality of the Nebraska statute, which may violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Texas v. Johnson and United States v. Eichman.[6] The American Civil Liberties Union of Nebraska is assisting Phelps-Roper in her legal defense."

RadHazGsays...

as much as i despise the phelps and the fact that they are getting this airtime, in all reality i think its a good thing. the more people that see how whacked out, bigoted, biased, and borderline psycho these people are, the more people see what religion can really do to a person. what about their kids even? who's to say their kids wouldn't me morally upstanding well mannered (or more likely just plain kid-like) children if they hadn't had the misfortune of being born to these whacko's? these people are the poster pin ups of how religion can be child abuse in the worst way. basically the more tv time the phelps get, the more they hurt their own case.

videosiftbannedmesays...

Sadly, this moron does have the right to his freedom of speech. It doesn't mean I have to agree with what he says and it doesn't mean that he has the right to add insult to injury by protesting at a funeral. But he does have the right to say it.

With that said, I can't wait until his crotchety, old ass comes down with cancer and eats him from the inside out, slowly and painfully.

Ahhhh, you have to love freedom of speech.

ronin165says...

Wonderful. It's morons like Phelps that give respectable Christians a bad name...just like the Jihadists giving Muslims a bad name...and Christian/Muslim/etc bashers giving respectable atheists and agnostics a bad name (I have plenty of atheist/agnostic friends, I respect their opinion, they respect mine, and the subject just doesn't come up).

MycroftHomlzsays...

So will he be forced to pay...Is this just for show? Does he even have $11e6?

Does anyone know?

MH

*I read a news story apparently the sum exceeds the net worth of Phelps and the Church. Maybe they will be bankrupted by litigation fees?

RadHazGsays...

something ive come across many, many, many times (its a fairly common theme). why, just why does religion get special dispensation as an "idea" or w/e you want to call it. how come muslim/christian/jew "bashers" give athiests a bad name?
suppose i pointed out how much i disagreed with say, communism. that i think its so totally open to corruption that it could never reasonably work to its true intent in any country. most likely id find some who agree with me, some who don't and thats that. im not despised or called a horrible person for disliking it.
BUT should someone say, point out the fact that its physically impossible beyond all reason, belief or otherwise that 1 man, 1 woman and 3 sons could build a boat of massive proportions. stock it with untold numbers of animals (who all behaved very nicely together, thank you very much.) FEED and water all said animals for over a month and that the entirety of the globe was covered in water for such a time is so preposterous as to be absurd. should someone point this out they are called out as being "hateful" and biased and who knows what else. someone explain to me just why these 3 groups are untouchable by comment, critique or questioning.

dgandhisays...

Phelps is an ass, BUT being an ass is still his constitutionally protected right.

If his church has 501c3 status it should be revoked based in political activity, that's legit. If they trespass or touch anybody they should be charged, convicted and put in jail, that's legit. Being batshit crazy is not and should not be a crime.

His being terribly offensively rude to people who he has no reasonable cause to bother is still freedom of speech, and while I can't think of a single thing he says which is not absurd, stupid or offensive I/we still have no right to fine him for being an ass.

ShakaUVMsays...

There's nutjob atheists (a higher percentage of atheists than Christians believe in ghosts) and there's nutjob Christians. He's a nutjob Christian. Desecrating a sacred ritual (as most religious funeral service is) is blasphemous, and not something most Christians would do, even if we disagreed with the beliefs of the person in question.

The first amendment, by the by, doesn't guarantee you the right to disrupt a private ceremony.

8914says...

Why would you protest a funeral? The man is dead give him peace. We can all agree that life is hard enough why inflict misery on others. If you want respect and freedom you must give respect and freedom.

dgandhisays...

ShakaUVM: "a higher percentage of atheists than Christians believe in ghosts"

This rather disregards the general meaning of Atheist. While there are many non-Christians who believe in all manner of supernatural entities it would be incorrect to label these people Atheists.

While Atheism is denoted as the absence of belief in an god or gods its connotation and general use is absence of belief in the supernatural, people who believe in ghosts may not be Christians, but they are not properly Atheists either.

That said there are nutjob Atheists, Randian "Objectivists" come to mind, but they pale in comparison to the nutjobs that exist, not simple along side, but because of religion. When people point to Mao and Stalin and say "evil atheists" it's just as relivant as "evil guys who wore hats" correlation is not causation. On the other hand people who go on crusades, or crash planes into buildings to kill infidels, or protest at funerals are being evil BECAUSE of there religious beliefs, that's a big difference.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More