Crazy Dog Really Likes The Campfire

What the hell is this dog up to? Very amusing in any case..
lucky760says...

>> ^EDD:
no upvote for the fucking retarded commentary

No, you misunderstand. They coated him with flame retardant flea and tick killer earlier in the day and the camera guy was just surprised the dog still wasn't catching fire. (The label said it was only good for an hour and the dog even went swimming without reapplying afterwards.)

At least that's according to the original submitter at YouTube.

budzossays...

I don't like pitbulls either. It doesn't matter whether they're just as friendly as any other dog. The problem is when something DOES go wrong... an attacking pitbull is like an entirely different species from any other attacking dog. That's the point all these pitbull advocates seem to miss. 25 - 50% of all dogs raised well will still have a biting incident at some point in their existence.

deathcowsays...

> statistic plucked out of thin air.. cite that please

He is right, there are plenty of studies, the ones that come to mind are:

Took and Brandybuck, 1968;
Wayne, Banner, Parker and Kent, 1985;
McVie, Nicks, Buckingham, Fleetwood 1997;

Finally, the study by Lynn, Canyon, Donovan and Jameson in the late 80's.

Don_Juansays...

Yo! Yes, this exact thing has happened to me! I don't know why I had to jump repeatedly over the fire, but I had to!!! It's NOT just a matter of ball warming! It is much, much more!!

oxdottirsays...

>> ^deathcow:
I do not like Pit Bulls !


>> ^budzos:
I don't like pitbulls either. It doesn't matter whether they're just as friendly as any other dog. The problem is when something DOES go wrong... an attacking pitbull is like an entirely different species from any other attacking dog. That's the point all these pitbull advocates seem to miss. 25 - 50% of all dogs raised well will still have a biting incident at some point in their existence.


The video that made me join Video Sift.

dannym3141says...

>> ^deathcow:
> statistic plucked out of thin air.. cite that please
He is right, there are plenty of studies, the ones that come to mind are:
Took and Brandybuck, 1968;
Wayne, Banner, Parker and Kent, 1985;
McVie, Nicks, Buckingham, Fleetwood 1997;
Finally, the study by Lynn, Canyon, Donovan and Jameson in the late 80's.


Next time don't watch lord of the rings for your invented studies!

I still don't buy it. If i knew an easy way to, i'd go look at the studies. But i'm pretty sure my dog would have been recorded as having a "biting" incident when he nibbles on a toddler's ear. He's being affectionate in the way he knows, but admittedly it's not pleasant if he uses too much force.

Smoke n mirrors i reckon. Dogs raised CORRECTLY aren't violent without reason in the same way humans raised CORRECTLY aren't violent without reason. (as in, it happens about as often)

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More