Ex Post Facto

It would be nice if someone would make a video like this and do it as though they were introducing each person to the view instead. Same thing name and then what their faith or beliefs are. Then maybe we could all appreciate better the amazing perspectives in the world.

Name all the different belief systems you know, then think about your friends and family and see if you can recall what they believe in.

*note he is just introducing what could be considered religious beliefs, that doesn't include any philisophical, political, or social beliefs Wow!

Is this supposed to be serious because if they are all I have to say is LOL!

It's Chuck upvote

I laughed my head off the first time I saw this and then proceeded to laugh about ten more times at it.

Uncontrollable rage, trying to take what he wants, attacking the employees, and lying. All the classical signs of an angry gamer. So I disagree, he is probably a gamer just a stupid one that got caught.

This is always fun here is the last paragraph

"FOX is not a news organization — it is a Republican propaganda outlet whose goal is to elevate Republicans while smearing Democrats. The Iraq war and the outcomes of the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections were direct results of traditional news organization following FOX's lead. As we face such an important presidential election, we cannot allow the traditional media to make the same mistake again."

All words will be replaced in caps

CNN is not a news organization — it is a DEMOCRAT propaganda outlet whose goal is to elevate DEMOCRATS while smearing REPUBLICANS. The Iraq war and the outcomes of the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections were direct results of traditional news organization following CNN's lead. As we face such an important presidential election, we cannot allow the traditional media to make the same mistake again.

So what the right wingers have Fox and the left wingers have CNN
I never knew that any of these cable news channels were actually about news I thought they were there for reality entertainment.

And this means something because... they are only one of every news site and newspaper that does this...

Originally legacy0100's quote, rephrased a little bit. I think I can endorse Bush Jr. with his quote making it sound just as reasonable. Amazing how we can rationalize someone else in our mind.

"I would want him as president even more for this reason. He knows how to be sneaky to get the job done. What, you guys think candy and rainbows run this nation?? Every decision they make requires minimum amount of evil to go with it.

Gore speaks of all these idealistic things but they simply aren't realistic. And besides, once you're president you should be busy fixing all the damage Clinton administration has done, not some goddamn system change. That'll throw the entire nation into chaos and NOTHING WILL GET DONE. Besides, things he speak of can be done even without him having to be president. He's still a republican. He'll have buddies to work with in the congress.

Bush Senior, the knight in shining armor on a white elephant of republican party, has admitted he would violate individual rights from US constitution if it meant saving the nation from Nuclear holocaust. And his political career isn't too far away from this idea either. But George W gets blammed for doing similar things his dad already has done. You guys really think George Bush Jr. campaigns and administration was squeaky clean???? (other things than the Air Gaurd scandal of course).

Bush's campaign isn't something equal to a nuclear emergency, but it means he is willing to get down and dirty in the filth of politics. I really hope he wins republican election. So stop bad mouthing George W for being realistic and knowing how to play the game.

As people say, Hate the game, babe. Not the playa."

Lol, this isn't news its a friendly CNN reminder because they didn't have anything better to talk about. We have been spying on ourselves since they went into orbit.

Totally subjective crap.

Lol, yeah irishman, in an almost completely christian country at its foundation, christianity played no role in the principles of culture, law, or philosophy of the foundation of america. Granted most of the founding fathers weren't overly religious but the basis of the the documents and law at the time were tailored with protestant christianity in mind, it would have been hard otherwise to make the people of the original 13 states to go along with it if the

"USA was not founded on christian principles in the slightest"
but seriously irishman where did you get the information to base this statement on?

Good for you smiley, I'm glad I am an American.

Yeah well maybe people should think about this before lighting up:
http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSL3173105820070731

Right or Left depending on where you stand is where it begins. Its one of those questions of perspective. Video doesn't have real arguement, really weak. Exmaples can be used to show how this video derives its arguement. For example if we were to compare that to China we look pretty tolerant. If we compare ourselves to the Netherlands then you can see the facism.

Left-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Center---------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------Right

Lol, prove to me all those organizations don't suck theo. I just thought it was funny because I find foxnews attack on the bloggers perfectly legitimate just the bloggers attack on foxnews is perfectly legitimate. They both broadcast their problems with each other or their allies through their various forms of broadcast sources, internet, tv, radio, etc.

Trust isn't given its earned and everyone on that list has really let me down theo, hence they all suck. My examples why just some of them, the U.S. government on why we were and are in Iraq, the media not properly telling what is going on because they waited a long time to tell how bad the civil war in Iraq was, and bloggers are just not that reliable I'm sorry just seen too much inaccurate information. I'm sorry citing wikipedia is just not a good source for information not to mention how many articles in wikipedia are in dispute about the truthfulness of the info, mainly controversial subjects. I don't think the internet is open as we all liked to believe, I think there isn't such a great exchange of information as there is prejudice and preconceived notions that are further reinforced talking to groups of people that you already agree with, biggest example blogs.

I would like to see more cooperative dialogue than is out there. I know my ability to have an open dialogue with someone isn't as great as I'd like it to be either.

Oh theo its not attacking bloggers, its attacking the left wing bloggers, they love the right wing bloggers as we all know. Which would make your title to this video misleading and false information just like foxnews and the guys that made this clip. Shouldn't it read "Fox Attacks: Liberal Bloggers" or better yet "Fox Attacks: Bloggers that don't agree with them"?