& Wisconsin would not vote for someone like that...or someone like Mr. Santorum!

Most telling to me is his inability to reasonably react to a simple question. He seems embarrassed after he curses, by the way he continues to badger the reporter. Just another amateur running for office. At least we won't have to worry about anti-curse laws on his agenda!

& for those who enjoy a little context, here is the quotation from Santorum's speech that the New York Times reporter and others "spun":

SANTORUM: Fifty-dollar abortions subsidized by RomneyCare. And if you’re low income, they’re free.
Why would we put someone up who is uniquely -- pick any other Republican in the country. He is the worst Republican in the country to put up against Barack Obama. Why would Wisconsin want to vote for someone like that?

from: http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/03/santorum-explains-bulls-remark-on-cnn-118709.html

source

Wasn't there a story recently about Adsense suspending accounts for violating agreements when the channel operator acknowledges payment for the amount of ads hit,... or something like this?

http://www.atheists.org/

he says "but I do remember," not "Glad you remember."

with the string of recent revenge videos against bike thieves in mind, this clearly seems to be a dramatic enactment in vain of such a video. but why? are they opposed or for such retributive acts? anyone find any other sources on this?

I remember seeing the southern california revenge videos where they let the thieves steal broken bikes that would fail in purposeful ways when the thieves rode them away. I don't think it's ok to steal bikes, but it equally doesn't seem ok to try to hurt people intentionally for stealing one either.

*kill

thunderf00t is alan moore?

damn, quick sift! no sooner than I had thought to sift this it's here! and with actual meaningful discussion! and new m.i.a.!

*kill

Just went to upload this. Couldnt get bangalter out of my head so I had to rewatch it. Too bad it didn't receive enough votes. I thought it was sift worthy for sure. Nice sift!

an unintentional pun? unlikely, you got me. segue. now are you saying that my comment somehow reinforces some myopic majority? because, I fail to see the greater connection between a position to fill time in a sports show with a celebrity in whatever capacity and any sort of hidden abc-white house agenda?

just so happens that potus plays bball, and he correctly picked the tarheels last year to win, and we could have a nice informative little sugue* with his new picks during the new tournament, and he could talk about exercise's importance...

nah, you're right. fake

*thanks blanks

it said cbs goddamn sports. maybe it was a segue-way for the march madness coverage on said affiliated networks? or maybe you should go buy another copy of catcher in the rye.

No one's really commented on the unbelievable creativity in this ad! Super Jail (tv) is similar to this video in that the genius of it's creative process is too obvious to ignore. Yet it is notoriously violent, too violent for my tastes. It seems this might be the case for those who object to either this Diesel ad's nsfw original content, or for the implications of such content being titled sfw, or simply its addition to the sift at all. However I know I'd like to participate in an open forum of as many thoughtful ideas as members can contribute, and then allow for community opinion to decide the merit of those ideas based on their possible goals and intentions, absent the broken yardstick of moral condescension; *art.