cats*

I read a few of the posts here after watching this, and then the one preceding this one, and it seems it's just a difference in language and meaning, Symbols. As a simple example, a person of Christian faith will be more likely to disagree with a scientific mind over the Earth's age precisely because they aren't using the same language, the same meaning behind their words, and therefore same standards! A simple retreat to the difference in method and goals would be much more meaningful. Nice sift, I think it really demonstrates the differences between Philosophy and Science and their ultimate goals.

I was sure this video was suggesting Biden was the confused unknown man who wandered in on the speech and then curses "big fucking deal." would've been a nice description for that video hah

Does it matter who sifted first? If you did awesome, just trying to figure this out, was trying to finally get something out of queue. Thought I had this up first and not sure when dupes are called usually.

My first reaction too, however maybe this will find some balance between the visual vacuum that is 3D and an actual film... and then there's Daft Punk!!!!!!

*discard

Exactly!

irony damn*

the Earth has sifted* off it's axis

zaireeka

saw this live and didn't interpret it as the expletive. only upon repeated viewing did it sound convincing, yet i'm still unconvinced

used to watch these in a philosophy class, nice post!

Post calling the kettle black?
But seriously, I don't understand what is pretentious about Mahr's comment about the American people. It seems clear that popular opinion is not always a reasonable reflection of a given issue. Instead, it seems public opinion is formed simply by association and inference of appearances, which is obviously not the most well-informed way to form an opinion, especially a political one. Hence the American people responding negatively to what is perceived as backsliding. However, it seems this is the case more often than not simply because such a move in the political realm leaves the impression of the admittance of a mistake.

Minus the McConnell reference, it seemed intentional to me. Look at him...
http://infinitesearch.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/mitch-mcconnell-09081.jpg

love b.c.