>> ^chilaxe:
Would you?


Dude...totally. You could tell this girl what...ever...the...salami...you...wanted, and she would believe you. That is completely worth it. Similarly, I am sure the pillow talk would be pricelessly inane.

And now, I *beg

>> ^Engels:
I dunno, maybe the gun carrier had his sister gang raped by the skateboarders. There's like, no context for me to root for one party or the other.


I agree - anything could have happened there to make this happen. Kind of hard for me to root with one side.

cherokeebreed4 - that better be sarcasm. If so, you are not doing it right. If not, get your head checked.

I think this one is good enough that I will *beg for it.

I mean...I don't want to expose myself to a massive onslaught of anger, but do we all really care this much? I support Payback and demon_ix - I think we all have better things to do than bash a music video. Can't we just all go back to kicking the verbal behind of Scientology and FOX News?

I like the guy in the black car who, at the very end, is like...well, I guess I will just go around this horrific accident and continue on my way.

In fact, it has been scientifically proven that diversity in the gene pool is a bad thing.

Wait, why does that not sound right?

Oh right, cause it's not.

Fuh-guh-whaaaa?

>> ^longde:
I'd dry hump that.


I agree - I just can't get enough of Obama.

<obscure, shameful reference>
This is why you cannot let people watch Britney Spears' music videos.
</obscure, shameful reference>

No prize will be awarded for world's fastest male to reach climax.

Sadly, I think this one is now *dead

This appears to be the same video as this video - sorry to be boring. That being said, I guess I cannot really do anything about it as I am not privileged enough to call the dupeof invocation. Assistance, anyone? It would be nice to combine the two entries in favor of getting the genius that is BriTaNick more widely dissemminated.

Mr. therealblankman, would you please desist in shooting blanks all over the front page?

Dude, you guys should have seen takes 1 through 2357.

Hmmm - while this is not a view I purport, it is one of which I am aware; some (read: not me) might argue that legalizing a market in sex results in its commodification, which could be argued to have a detrimental effect on our appreciation of, and could diminish our understanding of certain feelings that tend to be associated with, the act. Just playing Devil's Advocate in response to the "there is no downside to legalizing sex" position.

Haha - position.