>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:
-He is against drug laws...

He's against federal drug laws... he wants the states to decide.

I'm not sure I've heard him say if he opposes drug prohibition at the state level, but he certainly doesn't want the federal government telling the states they can't prohibit them.

No DX? Boo. =P

Impressive.

At least the driver is doing this on a long straight road so he can see oncoming traffic at a healthy distance. If nothing else they know their vehicle very well.

I'm surprised they can walk straight after that.

I get the feeling that Ron Paul doesn't vote based on party strategy. He's concerned with what he thinks is right, not what will benefit Republicans.

In that light it makes sense that the "establishment" would want to minimize his chances of winning. Obama vs Paul would be lose/lose for the Republican party.

Kinda funny how there's no one on the sideline at the game.

This guy could give LSD flashbacks.

Love it.

Well "Hg" is pronounced "Mercury", so I'm a little confused on this one.

Maybe "Nagnesium"?

Show-off.

Crazy animation style on the first part.

>> ^quantumushroom:

There was also a pill that mimicked exercise (stuck at the mouse phase).
Both of these items are from 2007-2008.


I read somewhere that they had begun human trials on that stuff, but it was in an article so who knows.

From what I read that drug caused the mitochondria to multiply (like during intense exercise), but it doesn't help other things like oxygen usage and cardio conditioning. There was something about it increasing lactic acid production in athletes, but I didn't dig too deep on the subject.

On performance drugs, I wonder how much resistance comes from the "clean sports" mentality. Lots of stuff (ex- steroids) have a lot of downsides, so it would be interesting to see if a relatively safe performance enhancer would be generally welcome if not designed specifically to address a medical problem.

OMG GET IT OFF GET IT OFF

The chinese room one is pointless. By his definition people don't understand anything either.

I'm surprised so many people disprove of this drug.

If the drug is dangerous or has side effects then I can understand, but we don't know yet.

On the other hand if it turns out to be both safe and effective then what's the problem?

>> ^Lann:

Turns out it's meth.

(This comment was brought to you by gwiz665)


http://videosift.com/video/Jimmy-Tangos-Fat-Busters-1