Yeah, that made me laugh too. Guy is groggy from 3 blows to the head and his buddy puts him back behind the wheel...

Soundtrack is annoying as hell...
However, funny to watch the actors throwing themselves around. Must have made for some good laughs on set...

It's doubtful anyone in the audience under the age of 50 knows who Don Rickles is... he's really from a different age of comedy.

I always thought the severed arm thing was done wrong. It's been hacked through and you see blood on the floor. I'm not an expert but I would assume that a laser would cauterize flesh instantly, therefore, no blood.

Oprah is another dim-bulb that promotes these types...
Seniors, in particular, are easy prey for these con artists, probably because they've lived long enough to see friends and family die.
My mother - suffering the early symptoms of dementia - put her and her 3rd husband deeply into debt because of these creeps. After she was institutionalized, I went through her paperwork and discovered the letters that she had written to various psychics asking for help. It broke my heart -- once they had her hooked they sent her endless letters each promising to reveal big secrets to her and she dutifully sent them money time and time again.
Ellen, show some backbone...

One scrappy little dog you got there...
Reminds me of my bigger dog... he never knows how to play with smaller dogs so he winds up sort of gently stepping on them like this big guy.

Also, a little bit of trivia... Donald Pleasance -- who plays the forger who eventually escapes with Charles Bronson -- actually spent time in a similar POW camp during WWII.

The father-in-law of a fellow Toastmaster actually participated in the Great Escape. He was a penguin... responsible for distributing the dirt dug from the tunnels throughout the prison yard via pockets built into their pants. Fortunately, he was NOT one of the ones chosen to escape. Aside from the fact there were no Americans at the POW camp, he said the movie was reasonably accurate, i.e. three tunnels, the one used came up short of the treeline...
The camp commander was imprisoned after the war. Some of his POWs went to visit him to let him know that they bore him no ill will. They were all soldiers and they considered the base commander to be a fair man who treated them well under the circumstances.
He refused to see them. Via an intermediary he relayed to them that he simply couldn't face them. He said that he never felt more ashamed to be a Nazi as when he heard that the SS had executed the 50 escapees from his camp.
The most fascinating part of Jim Lang's story though was the story BEFORE he arrived at the POW camp. Too long to relay here but he was shot out of the sky when returning from an air raid. Spent a few weeks on the run in the Belgium countryside.
He has since died but I fortunately recorded his presentation... just a great slice of history.

Pretty funny to see the distinct "Where'd it go?" expression on the dogs' faces and watch them try to figure it out...

The odds that a cyclist, a mattress and a webcam would be at the same space and time are inconceivable.

Dear morons... let the video speak for itself. You don't have to bray like a jackass to cue us in that it's funny. You are like the most annoying laugh track ever...

Quirky, but I agree that the upbeat tempo doesn't really convey heart ache or loss to me...

I am tired of debating stupid people... you win, it's an illusion.

Moving on...

Yeah, no worries. On the Internet, you're never sure who's just yanking your chain and who's an intellectual midget.

From Wikipedia:
An optical illusion (also called a visual illusion) is characterized by visually perceived images that differ from objective reality.

That means when you stare at an object DIRECTLY, you are tricked into believing that it has different qualities than it does.

In this example, you aren't starting at the arrows... you are staring at a diffracted image of the arrows. The diffracted arrows REALLY do point in the opposite direction. There's no illusion here.

Consider this...

If I put a rose-tinted pane of glass in front of the arrows, would you consider that an optical illusion?

Would you think "Hey, those arrows were on white paper before, NOW the paper is pink! Mind blown! Optical illusion!'?

No, you understand that you are seeing the colour pink because that's the property of the pane of glass IN FRONT OF the white sheet.

If you put a white sheet in front of the arrows, would you think: "Hey, the arrows have disappeared? Optical illusion!"?

No, that's the property of the sheet in front of the arrows.

And so on...

Hopefully, that clarifies it for you...