*requeue should get 'some' response
So I did a *requeue. And another, and another. No response.
If someone evokes a *requeue, the Siftbot should reply with a (polite) message informing the user that the invocation of *requeue has been removed, please feel free to do *beg.
Now, 2 things I'm jumping the gun with:
I'm guessing *requeue was removed, reasonably, and replaced with the Powerpoint stuff with the Beggar's Corner and the PQueue, makes sense. I still have to find the memo that indicates this, perhaps the explanation could be cited as a Hyperlink in the SiftBot's response.
My Personal Sad Disclaimer & Request
This is my second Sift Talk Post EVER.
Did I do it okay? If I don't find this, and the comments, or where it's moved, can someone please send me a message about what happened to this? I've posted a message before and never saw it again, and was discouraged to use SiftTalk again.
Many thanks. VideoSift rocks.
If someone evokes a *requeue, the Siftbot should reply with a (polite) message informing the user that the invocation of *requeue has been removed, please feel free to do *beg.
Now, 2 things I'm jumping the gun with:
I'm guessing *requeue was removed, reasonably, and replaced with the Powerpoint stuff with the Beggar's Corner and the PQueue, makes sense. I still have to find the memo that indicates this, perhaps the explanation could be cited as a Hyperlink in the SiftBot's response.
My Personal Sad Disclaimer & Request
This is my second Sift Talk Post EVER.
Did I do it okay? If I don't find this, and the comments, or where it's moved, can someone please send me a message about what happened to this? I've posted a message before and never saw it again, and was discouraged to use SiftTalk again.
Many thanks. VideoSift rocks.
7 Comments
maatcIgnoring nonsensical *requeue request from meatbags
Here is the "memo":
http://www.videosift.com/talk/Requeue-Revamped
and
http://www.videosift.com/talk/Introducing-Beggars-Corner
JAPRThey had sifty give the response politely responding in that way for a while, I guess they figured all the regulars had seen it enough to know by now.
choggiedoogles' arregular, he's simply slow on the uptake.....
doogleSo perhaps SiftBot stops with the response after a few times?
If that's the case, should keep it on, because if a user after that is still evoking *requeue, they should be reminded. Perhaps. Suggestion.
Oh, and thanks Maatc for the links.
rottenseedwow slower than gorgonheap?
AemaethYeah, I hadn't *requeued for a while and couldn't figure out why sifty was giving me the silent treatment. Did a google search and found out why...
doogle* requeue.
What? Huh? No response?
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.