Singular channel removal invocation?
No doubt this has been suggested before (probably multiple times), but my hopeless "advanced" searching didn't reveal anything, so I'll post anyway and risk incurring wrath
Would it be difficult to have an invocation allowing for the removal of a video from a singular channel, rather than having to invoke * nochannel and re-apply each one?
*-[channel name], perhaps?
Thoughts? Useful, or just pointless and lazy with the * nochannel ability?
Would it be difficult to have an invocation allowing for the removal of a video from a singular channel, rather than having to invoke * nochannel and re-apply each one?
*-[channel name], perhaps?
Thoughts? Useful, or just pointless and lazy with the * nochannel ability?
8 Comments
I think it's a great idea.
Upvote!
It's been mentioned before, and has generally been ignored for the simple fact that nochannel gets the job done.
Plus, *- would be bad form, as '-' is used (by me, anyway), as a 'safety' to avoid firing off an accidental *-ban or other invocations.
I like the idea, but we've been doing fine without it. You can always messages the channel owner and ask them to do the one-click removal (they can kick any vid out of their channel) if you don't want to run the invocation yourself.
>> ^MarineGunrock:
I think it's a great idea.
I´d even go as far as: *Quality suggestion
Awarding berticus with one star point for this contribution to Sift Talk - declared quality by maatc.
One more thing:
I miss the option to upvote an original SiftTalk post.
Its possible for all the comments, but not the starting post.
After someone has invoked * quality there is no quick way to show you like what was said in the inital post.
I would really like to see the original post treated as a comment that can be upvoted.
Good ideas
Brilliant idea sir! Definitely quality.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.