Here, since you're incapable of even looking....
https://youtu.be/g1qaChlsRmA

Wouldn't it be nice if you supported someone who wasn't so despised by all news media and only supported by sycophantic opinion?
Wouldn't it be great if you had someone who, when they denied the disgusting, disrespectful, anti American statements was at least minimally believable?
Because Fox won't post the clip doesn't mean it doesn't exist, they often hide their own reporting and replace it with opinion because they fear Trump sending his crazy murderers and stalkers after their personnel?
Fortunately it went out and others recorded it, not hard to find took me 4 seconds...
https://youtu.be/g1qaChlsRmA

You won't get whistleblowers against Trump coming out publicly, consider the threats the last whistleblower endured, any Trump whistleblower, it's a career ender even though retaliation is illegal, and the start of a life of fear because anyone anywhere might be the next right wing assassin attempting to murder your wife because you spoke up against the moronic messiah.

Wouldn't it be great if there weren't direct evidence of nearly everything he's accused of, (not the shit you made up)?

Trump hates blacks-definitely, undeniably, historically, on tape, video, and in business and investigatory documents going back at least 50 years without pause. Only the blind won't see it.
Trump hates women-if they don't serve his ego, definitely
Trump hates Gays-yep, as long as it makes him palatable to his base for certain
Trump hates military- definitely, thinks they're dumb because he doesn't understand service to anyone but himself
Trump hates poor people- absolutely unless they're stroking his ego and handing over their cash for his frauds
Trump hates everyone.- everyone who won't stroke his insecure ego, yes he does
Trump raped more woman- 24 is a lot, more than who?
Trump watches other men F his wife and J Off.- You made that claim up, that was Falwell
Trump raped little boys- you made that up, but maybe
Trump raped little girls- almost a certainty, his best friend did on Trump's properties for years and years after being prosecuted and convicted, with Trump's knowledge
Trump has perverted sex dungeon in secrete side room in WH and many on this properties.- infinitely more likely than the one your ilk claim Clinton had. Trump's bestie could have given him pointers on the dungeon
Trump and Putin lies- yes, Trump and Putin lie constantly, often coordinated lies. I guess you don't believe the Republican created intelligence report that said clearly most of the impeachment charges were correct and every Trump administration witness lied under oath, eh?
Trump and China lies- Trump has certainly lied about China, but not really in collusion with them, but not for lack of trying both privately and on tv. The Chinese simply don't trust him, so aren't hitching their wagons to him.
Another investigation by Adam Schiff- if he waits until the facilitating republicans are out of the Senate and there's a chance of prosecution, not the prosecution working directly with the defendant like the first impeachment, then it's time to get Schiffty

Fake news like Fox. Funny, they went from the onlytrusted source to fake news the instant they actually investigated a Trump story instead of just repeating Trump's denial.

Trump picked a fight with the media before being elected so he could convince dunces that they're just all mad at him and willing to throw away their career by outright lying about him for no reason. Only a true idiot falls for that. Sadly that's at least 1/4 of Americans....definitely you believe it.

It is a Trump story, and he is lying as usual. Otherwise your tag would be erased.

Yes, He does want to please God. That's who He believes He is.

Yes, he does. http://www.sodapopstop.com/products/detail.cfm?link=266

Yes, he does. As long as he faithfully executes the law.

But that is moot. There is absolutely no reason why POTUS/admin thinks the individual mandate should be delayed for a year. There is no reason.

Yes, there is a reason why republicans want it delayed, because they not only win this fight, they also remove a major revenue stream for ACA and then put the mandate back in play during the election.

Why would republicans want this to happen during an election?

Because bad-faith wedge issues is all they have. They are purposefully denying people, including kids and low-income citizens, access to affordable health care. They are 10000000% willing to let millions suffer for them to score political points in 2014.

This is why the GOP needs to cripple the baggers, and then the entire republican party should jump off a fucking cliff. This country has moved decades beyond their nonsense. The corporate Democrats are as far of a right-wing group as any modern country needs.

@L0cky @bcglorf

It's disappointing that TYT didn't mention the context, but it's also facetious to claim that the article was purely a thought experiment.

Yes, he does say the following in the beginning of the article: "No, no, it's just a silly thought experiment! I'm not serious about this! Nobody can predict the future! It's just a game. The game of Unlikely Events."

...But the rest of the article is spent stating opinions and things that are just outright wrong as if they are completely factual and true.

There're no "let's just consider for a moment that..." in the article, nor are there any what-ifs. He simply goes from claiming that Iran will nuke Israel if the US doesn't step in, to claiming that Obama is, effectively, a dictator.

And all of this craziness takes part during the set-up for his "thought experiment." This is the context that Orson Scott Card himself provides us with.

It was very low for TYT to skip over the fact that this is, in part, a thought experiment. However, it is also false to claim that it was just a thought experiment, and nothing more.

No, I meant he compared that one action with a whore/harlot/prostitute, but fell short of actually calling her one. It's like the difference between saying, "You're a retard," and "That was a retarded thing to do." Agreed about insulting and disrespectful.>> ^Payback:

>> ^messenger:
That's a step down from calling her a whore, but meh.>> ^hpqp:
yes he does.


Harlot is accepted to mean a prostitute or promiscuous woman. Not a step down, just an outdated equivalent. Still insulting. Still incredibly disrespectful.

>> ^messenger:

That's a step down from calling her a whore, but meh.>> ^hpqp:
yes he does.



Harlot is accepted to mean a prostitute or promiscuous woman. Not a step down, just an outdated equivalent. Still insulting. Still incredibly disrespectful.

That's a step down from calling her a whore, but meh.>> ^hpqp:

yes he does.

>> ^hpqp:

>> ^messenger:
SB doesn't call people whores. He says anyone who has sex outside marriage is doing something wrong. Everything else is your mind filling in the blanks. An opinion sincerely put forward is a positive input. A "negative actor", as you say, and more sincere than QM, by far.>> ^Payback:
Me, I wonder why ShinyB is allowed to stay. All it does is call the female sifters whores and damn the rest of us to the Enternal Fires. Talk about no positive input.


Actually, yes he does, but his blue-balled, self-righteous self-repression gave birth to a running joke (isn't that right, you harlots @UsesProzac and @berticus?) so I guess it's okay. That being said, at least most of QM's idiotic comments are short, not pages-long preaching. And he sometimes makes a funny comment, unlike shinyb.


Yea, what hpqp said, I was just too lazy to look up those posts...

>> ^messenger:

SB doesn't call people whores. He says anyone who has sex outside marriage is doing something wrong. Everything else is your mind filling in the blanks. An opinion sincerely put forward is a positive input. A "negative actor", as you say, and more sincere than QM, by far.>> ^Payback:

Me, I wonder why ShinyB is allowed to stay. All it does is call the female sifters whores and damn the rest of us to the Enternal Fires. Talk about no positive input.



Actually, yes he does, but his blue-balled, self-righteous self-repression gave birth to a running joke (isn't that right, you harlots @UsesProzac and @berticus?) so I guess it's okay. That being said, at least most of QM's idiotic comments are short, not pages-long preaching. And he sometimes makes a funny comment, unlike shinyb.

>> ^mxxcon:

>> ^carneval:
>> ^mxxcon:
2 power hungry pigs trying to measure whose penis is larger.
one doesn't want to be arrested because he's a sheriff, the other one thinks "you don't pull rank on me, i'll bust your ass".

Not sure I agree. The trooper is just doing his job, and he's doing it pretty respectfully, while taking his obligation to arrest the guy seriously at the same time.
Yes he does. But would he be doing that if camera/mic wasn't on?


Maybe, maybe not. I'm glad the camera is there, regardless.

>> ^carneval:

>> ^mxxcon:
2 power hungry pigs trying to measure whose penis is larger.
one doesn't want to be arrested because he's a sheriff, the other one thinks "you don't pull rank on me, i'll bust your ass".

Not sure I agree. The trooper is just doing his job, and he's doing it pretty respectfully, while taking his obligation to arrest the guy seriously at the same time.
Yes he does. But would he be doing that if camera/mic wasn't on?

>> ^csnel3:

@ghark "Props to that guy, he's got balls that's for sure."
Yes he does, Just dont let Sandusky see them!


That's ok, he seems to be older than 10.

@ghark "Props to that guy, he's got balls that's for sure."

Yes he does, Just dont let Sandusky see them!

Tags for this video have been changed from 'dan savage, spit, swallow' to 'dan savage, spit, swallow, yes he does' - edited by calvados