"ABCnews.com.co is a fake news site which mimics the URL, design and logo of the actual news site ABCnews.com" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABCnews.com.co

This is scam 101, don't fall for it, bob.

Come trick or treat at our house this year and see the spoooooky company logo pumpkin. Before you leave, don't forget to grab a handful of business cards, lanyards, and click pens. Happy Halloween!

I know it's MIT News, but I can’t help seeing MILF News in that logo...

I agree! I am also bored out of my mind with the whole lego thing. Whenever I get into a car with someone I always remind them that points can be earned by running over lego people.

Especially crippled lego people with broken and missing hands, missing legs. Might as well run them over and break them completely. Or the ones with faded logos from your dad's era of legos -- stamp out those faded icons. Or the ones with missing faces. What happened to their faces?? WHAT HAPPENED TO THEIR FACES?!?!?!?! So bored of it all -- of all the legos... so bored of... legos. Like prostitutes in GTA. I'm so bored of prostitutes... in GTA.

Ut oh.

At first I was all ,"who is this youtube wanna-be reporter?" and then I saw the CNN logo.

That Maratus bubo Peacock spider's markings look NOTHING like a horned owl. That shit is the Decepticon logo. No doubt.

Kid doesn't know he just gave that T-shirt company some really good free publicity. Many more people will buy shirts there now, while they might lose 2 Trump customers. I'm pretty sure they'll be OK.

I think they did him a solid, not only making what appears to be a well made shirt, but also subliminally including the underlying message that his logo carries, at no extra charge. He can turn his shirt inside out if people get insulted at his logo, what's on the inside is less provocative.

This is perfect for me, I love complaining ;-)


-OS First Timer channel. (Between the lisp of the presenter, the child like mum and just strange father it has got to be the most cringeworthy videos in history).

-Any video with an intro/logo that goes for more than 2 seconds

-The Young Turks (a perfect example of "the empty can rattles the most")

-Rich Piana, right babe?

-Mean spirited pranks / experiments

LOGO for me.

*ban
No movie here, but posting a full movie is against the posting guidelines...so I'll treat this like they DID post the full movie and not just 1:38:06 of the Universal logo.

Anyone else see the logo as Milf News?

@ChaosEngine
he does credit them!
Massive thanks to:
AListProductions: https://www.youtube.com/user/AListPro...
Saul Rosales: https://www.youtube.com/user/superman...
River A.C.E. for the amazing logo: https://www.youtube.com/user/rEdits92...
Shadow Rabbit for the amazing logo:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCURN...

**This video was made purely for fun.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended.

and you guys...sheesh...i can't do stuff like this,and the 10yr old that resides in me still thinks this is awesome!

Isn't that what they did though? As long as you have a set demographic reacting to videos, couldn't it be argued that you're infringing on their trademark?

Trademarks are much more broad and powerful protection than copyright. They protect your brand and/or logos and slogans. They also protect against things “confusingly similar,” so it’s possible you could be sued for naming your video “Kids have emotions.”

Source:
http://ryanmorrisonlaw.com/attorneys-react-the-fine-bros-react-trademark/

So please explain to me why this lawyer is wrong. And you might want to tone it down a little - you're sounding on par with the worst that reddit has to offer, and disproving the notion that the videosift community is more mature and capable of having a civil conversation.

Once again you do not understand the fucking difference between COPYRIGHT and TRADEMARK.

They shut down that guy's video for a COPYRIGHT violation because he used their videos wholesale without permission from them.

Whereas you can bet your ass that fine bros get all the legal permissions necessary from all the videos, items and people before they run any of their episodes. They are too big of a target and too much money at stake not to do it!

They shut down that guys video for COPYRIGHT violation, not TRADEMARK violation. They got a trademark for the logos and the exact format of their shows!
They did not trademark the concept of a "react" video!

Sincere kudos to them for keeping advertising well regulated on TV.

...That being said, how can they get that so RIGHT, while at the same time Premier League jerseys are 90% billboard space for things entirely unrelated to football, MAYBE with a tiny team logo somewhere. Compare that to, say, NHL jerseys (or any of the US big 4, really). I think Canadians would rise up in revolt and/or burn Gary Bettman in effigy if he told an original 6 team to put some f*&%ing corporate logo on their sweater...