search results matching tag: glorious
» channel: learn
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
Videos (183) | Sift Talk (14) | Blogs (7) | Comments (511) |
Videos (183) | Sift Talk (14) | Blogs (7) | Comments (511) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Coke + Raw Pork = Worms!
Are you trying to get me to self link? All right. I'll try to recreate this, but it will have to wait until I go to the grocery store again. We had pork chops last night, even, but they were the frozen variety.
I want fresh off the shelf pork chops for this. And I'll have to buy some Coke! Glorious excuse for it.
And why the fuck are you talking to me in third person? It's freaking me out.
>> ^legacy0100:
>> ^UsesProzac:
>>
I stated earlier that I had seen that, and they couldn't recreate it. No little white dots appeared and rose up. I've done this on my own with chops.
So to say that's a proven false is ambiguous at best.
Edit: Everyone should try it on their own. Each of the times I did at Sunflower Market, it happened. This was with organic, free range pork chops. I really don't know if they're worms, but we called them worms then and it was definitely yucky looking and worth a laugh in the back rooms.
You have it all backwards Prozac. The video is proven false because many others failed to recreate the same result the video claimed under the same presented condition. There are numerous articles and videos pointing out that they could not duplicate the claimed results (http://youtu.be/B-oapHo-gdU). The fact that others cannot duplicate the same results makes the original video's claim inaccurate. It's Scientific Method 101 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproducibility)
If you are to argue that the duplicators have failed to carry the experiment properly, then you must provide evidence where the duplicated experiments have done wrong. It's a pretty darn simple experiment and it's rather hard to screw up. If there were other important preexisting conditions that had to be met prior to executing the experiment, then the original video should have stated these conditions. The video claims 'pour coke', 'over the pork' and '2 minutes'. People have followed the instructions, didn't see same result. Therefore the suggested hypothesis claimed by the video cannot be proven.
Also, Trichinella spiralis is quasi-microscopic. It is TINY and barely visible to the naked human eye. Try to Googling a photo of it and you'll only find microscopic images. Therefore, the so-called 'worms' visible in video cannot be Trichinella spiralis.
UsesProzac claims she's done the experiment and have seen 'something yucky'. Chances are that it wasn't Trichinella spiralis since they can't be seen by the naked eye. Perhaps she did see 'something yucky', but as to what that is, remains a mystery. No one has seen it but her, and it's her objective opinion claiming that it looked like a worm. I suggest UsesProzac upload a video of her experiment. Shot continuously without break in between, and in high quality so that the results are visible. Otherwise the existing evidence all over the net are stacked against you.
Sigh No More - Mumford and Sons
the Cave is glorious, Little Lion Man is pretty good and the rest of the album (including this track) is just ok for me. Upvoted because it sits on the same album as one of my favourite songs.
Never, Ever Give Up. Arthur's Inspirational Transformation!
WHY DID HE SHAVE OFF THAT GLORIOUS MANE???
Neil DeGrasse Tyson on Big Think
With so many agreeable comments, i taught myself how to quote properly
* pats himself on the back *
![](https://videosift.com/vs5/emoticon/smile.gif)
>> ^ChaosEngine:
If Yahweh showed up tomorrow, I'd start looking to form a resistance.
^ I'm in and have a bunch of analytical minded friends who would be gearing up before they even heard the word 'resistance'.
>> ^ChaosEngine:
pineapple on pizza is an unholy abomination
^ /agree re pineapple. It belongs on my pizza's as much as i belong in churches, it ruins the experience.
>> ^ChaosEngine:
There is another position on this: anti-theist. Most strongly evinced by Christopher Hitchens.
>> ^volumptuous:
Richard Dawkins' approach to this is the term "non-theist".
^ The terms 'Anti-Theist' and 'Non-Theist' are more sensible/respectable than 'Atheist' imo (more so after hearing Dawkins mention Afairyist), but i accept the latter as it requires less side-track debating over terminology.
>> ^Boise_Lib:
I really, really hope that Videosift5 gives the ability to spend a PP on a "super upvote" for comments. (or something similar).
@Sepacore would get mine!! (above)
^ Cheers
>> ^Boise_Lib:
I'm absolutely against anyone, or thing, that shows the pettiness, jealousy, and just plan babyishness of Yahweh having any control over human beings.
^ /agree
>> ^Boise_Lib:
But, what about something (this is why I don't use the word "god"), which is benevolently seeking knowledge through it's extrusions--(that's us)--into this space-time we inhabit.
If we are all part of this thing can it really be abhorrent?
^ .. make duck bills with your fingers, put them to your temples and open them up as you pull your hands away: you're blowing my mind.
>> ^Boise_Lib:
My point is if there is something else out there, we--as a species--have no idea what that might be (all religions are wrong).
^ /agree
>> ^Boise_Lib:
[Sidepoint: The mixture of taste sensations evinced by the salty, savory ham and the sweet, sour pineapple enmeshed in melty cheese is a glorious thing.]
^ * slumps down in a corner and cries softly while singing Amy Grant's 'Innocence Lost' (Christian music, lol Google FTW) *
I can't relive my life
I can't retrace my tracks
I can't undo what's done
There is no going back
I chased a selfish dream
Did not survey the cost
Illusions disappeared
I've found my innocence lost
Some say it's lessons learned
Some say it's a living life
I say it's choices made
Knowing wrong from right
>> ^ChaosEngine:
What I do have to contend with is mainstream religion (and while we're at it, faulty thinking around astrology, homoeopathy, etc).
^ worked in offices for past 5 years.. don't get me started on astrology and homeopathy. The girls and 1 guy don't care what i say about religions and Gods.. but the moment i open my mouth about those other 2.. (think it's because i kept showing them proofs against the practices)
@Lawdeedaw
I see the points you're making, but there's a lot more to an Agnostic position than there is to either of the extremes. For 1, there's room to fluctuate to either end of the extremes without having to make an incredible claim that simply can't be backup in any scientific way as there are always 'trump cards' for this subject.
Better than Physics, Cosmology, Chemistry and Biology, imo Psychology has the greatest chance of proving God doesn't exist, but unfortunately it's not going to be an actual 'proof', at best (and it irritates/pains me to say) it will only be a really good reason to 'believe' or suggest that Gods are most likely figments of our imaginations off of our preferences. Easily ignored when in the face of 'faith'.
Call it 'safe' or even 'fence sitting' if need be, but i call it the result of thinking about the subject and being honest enough to accept 'i, nor anyone, actually knows.. but i think X due to Y'.
I used to think an Atheistic position for scientists was logical off of the point of 'no proof, don't believe'. But the reality is that scientists do believe things without evidence, they work their butts off to prove the idea, and either succeed or prove the opposite, sometimes even discovering things they had no intention of or even an idea that they were close to.. point being there are stages where they have reason to believe but don't have proof and these stages can make getting funding quite difficult.
For a Scientist, publicly and privately resting on an agnostic position somewhere between the 2 ends of the scale is more reasonable/justifiable and less arrogant/distracting.
If you can't honestly state "I know there is no God" in any/every debate/discussion, then technically you're Agnostic (unless stating the complete opposite).. but like me would take up a stance a pin prick away from 1 of the 2 disingenuous and arrogant extremes (specifically the good one, that doesn't 'justify' us not caring about others).
>> ^VoodooV:
Ditto. Agnostic is the only sane choice. Fuck Atheists who want to put agnostics under their "umbrella"
^ If it ever started raining/reigning in the way and with the unforgiving dedications a number of religions have in the past, i hazard the guess you would likely jump under my umbrella quick smart when it was the only place that gave us both the option to state 'i don't know/care' and live to tell about it.
/Agree re the disapproval of Atheists disregarding the line.. but to this day, I've never met an 'Atheist' that definitively stated when pushed 'i know God doesn't exist'.
Neil DeGrasse Tyson on Big Think
>> ^Boise_Lib:
![](https://videosift.com/vs5/emoticon/teeth.gif)
That position shows a tendency to think of a god as one already defined by a religion.
If Yahweh shows up I'll be one of the first to join your resistance movement. I'm absolutely against anyone, or thing, that shows the pettiness, jealousy, and just plan babyishness of Yahweh having any control over human beings.
But, what about something (this is why I don't use the word "god"), which is benevolently seeking knowledge through it's extrusions--(that's us)--into this space-time we inhabit.
If we are all part of this thing can it really be abhorrent?
My point is if there is something else out there, we--as a species--have no idea what that might be (all religions are wrong).
Well, you're kinda redefining the terms of the debate (not that your point isn't interesting or valid). In broad terms, I agree with you. If it turns out that we are part of some benevolent science experiment of just the expression of the universe made conscious or the force or any one of a hundred ideas we've all had stoned, I won't rush out to take up arms against that.
But I don't really believe in that. I don't have to contend with it. What I do have to contend with is mainstream religion (and while we're at it, faulty thinking around astrology, homoeopathy, etc). It's a man made thing, but on the extreme outside chance they're right, well, I've posted this before, but it's still a great quote, so take it away Carl Marsalis
"Even if you could convince a variant thirteen, against all the evidence, that there really was a god? He'd just see him as a threat to be eliminated. If god were demonstrably real? Guys like me would just be looking for ways to find him and burn him down."
>> ^Boise_Lib:
[Sidepoint: The mixture of taste sensations evinced by the salty, savory ham and the sweet, sour pineapple enmeshed in melty cheese is a glorious thing.]
Heretic!
Neil DeGrasse Tyson on Big Think
>> ^ChaosEngine:
There is another position on this: anti-theist. Most strongly evinced by Christopher Hitchens. Not only do you not believe in god, you're glad there's no god as the whole idea is abhorrent to you.
Personally, I fall into this camp. If Yahweh showed up tomorrow, I'd start looking to form a resistance.
That said, I don't conduct myself like this in daily life. Why? Because it has no bearing on me. I live my life mostly free from the influence of religion. I have many friends who are believers. We don't agree on this issue, but meh, we also don't agree on whether pineapple should ever be on a pizza (for the record, pineapple on pizza is an unholy abomination).
That position shows a tendency to think of a god as one already defined by a religion.
If Yahweh shows up I'll be one of the first to join your resistance movement. I'm absolutely against anyone, or thing, that shows the pettiness, jealousy, and just plan babyishness of Yahweh having any control over human beings.
But, what about something (this is why I don't use the word "god"), which is benevolently seeking knowledge through it's extrusions--(that's us)--into this space-time we inhabit.
If we are all part of this thing can it really be abhorrent?
My point is if there is something else out there, we--as a species--have no idea what that might be (all religions are wrong).
[Sidepoint: The mixture of taste sensations evinced by the salty, savory ham and the sweet, sour pineapple enmeshed in melty cheese is a glorious thing.]
So Is America/Israel/Etc... Going Into Iran? (Military Talk Post)
As per the Sift Talk stuff and guidelines, do you want a few video links is that it? A few comments from members on this issue to "pad" what I wanted to make a quick topic? It's up to you how you wish to see the politics played out here on the sift, but from reading the "tough love" article I broke almost nothing sacred to the glorious Sift Talk.
I could leave this to the more regular attendees of the Sift Talk, but this type of talk becomes FAR to vitriolic.
So, I'll say message received, but stay on topic commenting the rest of the way and let's keep this matter closed here.
Girl swallowed by pavement in China
>> ^bareboards2:
![](https://videosift.com/vs5/emoticon/wink.gif)
As probably the only person to see your original comment, allow me to congratulate you on your edit. It is a glorious example of glass half empty being converted to glass three quarters full.
I love that. Honestly.
>> ^xxovercastxx:
edit: (nevermind)
It was more a case of my poor memory suddenly kicking in and remembering more about how it all went down.
Girl swallowed by pavement in China
As probably the only person to see your original comment, allow me to congratulate you on your edit. It is a glorious example of glass half empty being converted to glass three quarters full.
I love that. Honestly.
>> ^xxovercastxx:
edit: (nevermind)
Girl swallowed by pavement in China
Let me get out some polish for your glorious silver armor and some food for your mighty steed. We have not had a white knight of your caliber in ages.
>> ^tsquire1:
The fact that a comment critiquing rape culture gets downvoted, and one that promotes rape culture gets up voted, reveals a heavy nerdbro tendency on this site that is really quite sick.
No, I dont care if it is 'just a joke'. You infantile nethipsters that make these comments never have to worry about being raped, never have to worry about what they wear walking down the street and if it will promote 'catcalls'. You don't have to worry about facing violence by going out at night or, if you do get sexually assaulted, have to worry about who will even believe you.
Plainly, you have no idea what you are talking about.
That is why it is funny to you. Because you are that removed from reality. Your laughter is a privileged laughter. Your cynicism is anti-human.
>> ^Hybrid:
You wouldn't be saying that 30 mins after I put some Rohypnol in your drink.
Karaganda Building Collapse - (April 6th, 2012)
Residential Leanings of Kazakhstan for Make Benefit Glorious Notion of Oh Shit.
Game of Thrones Character Featurette - Theon Greyjoy
I haven't read the books, and I don't know when this would be, but Game of Thrones has just been renewed for a third season, which is a good sign.
>> ^alien_concept:
>> ^shuac:
Being the cynic that I am, I believe HBO will pull the plug on this show (citing costs, as per usual) well before we get to see what ultimately happens to Theon. But if I'm wrong, it'll be glorious!
I think you're right, but I live in hope!
Game of Thrones Character Featurette - Theon Greyjoy
>> ^shuac:
Being the cynic that I am, I believe HBO will pull the plug on this show (citing costs, as per usual) well before we get to see what ultimately happens to Theon. But if I'm wrong, it'll be glorious!
I think you're right, but I live in hope!
Game of Thrones Character Featurette - Theon Greyjoy
Being the cynic that I am, I believe HBO will pull the plug on this show (citing costs, as per usual) well before we get to see what ultimately happens to Theon. But if I'm wrong, it'll be glorious!
artician
(Member Profile)
But not worth an upvote?![](https://videosift.com/vs5/emoticon/wink.gif)
In reply to this comment by artician:
I am an artist for a living. I've never really gotten math, and only gained an appreciation for it in my last year of college. I probably don't grok anything above basic algebgra, but this makes me salivate. It's amazing.
Yea, some people have way too much time on their hands. Some people use their time in such simultaneously impressive/mundane ways, that I would give them a job if this were on their resume. This is glorious.