>> ^budzos:

This is an idiotic response to criticism.
>> ^Yogi:
>> ^spoco2:
So... I thought that was kinda badly done really.
If this wasn't on the sift I wouldn't have bothered watching for longer than a few seconds. The initial portion did not grab me in any way. I didn't know why I should care about the conference I was watching.
And then it was the usual heavy handed demonstration of over the top reaction to copyright infringement.
This doesn't really do anything to bolster the cause. It's been done before and better in the past.
If you're trying to get some message across on the internet, you really do have to have something to initially grab people's interest. It doesn't mean everything has to be quick fire boobs and kittens, but just something at the beginning to make me have any reason to watch further. Over a minute spent at the beginning with a boring mock press conference does not make me want to sit around any longer.
And then I did, and was treated to a mundane story. If you're going to actually get off your arses and spend the time to properly produce a nicely shot video... spend SOME time up front creating a worthwhile script that people will actually want to watch

Hey that's great, what did you do today?



Pretty much, but it ain't no ad-hom rule-breaker....Yogis' just doin' his thing, ruffled feathers be damned!!

This is an idiotic response to criticism.

>> ^Yogi:

>> ^spoco2:
So... I thought that was kinda badly done really.
If this wasn't on the sift I wouldn't have bothered watching for longer than a few seconds. The initial portion did not grab me in any way. I didn't know why I should care about the conference I was watching.
And then it was the usual heavy handed demonstration of over the top reaction to copyright infringement.
This doesn't really do anything to bolster the cause. It's been done before and better in the past.
If you're trying to get some message across on the internet, you really do have to have something to initially grab people's interest. It doesn't mean everything has to be quick fire boobs and kittens, but just something at the beginning to make me have any reason to watch further. Over a minute spent at the beginning with a boring mock press conference does not make me want to sit around any longer.
And then I did, and was treated to a mundane story. If you're going to actually get off your arses and spend the time to properly produce a nicely shot video... spend SOME time up front creating a worthwhile script that people will actually want to watch

Hey that's great, what did you do today?

>> ^sirlivealot:

....And here we present the classic ad hominem response. For more examples please refer to the list of fallacious arguments.
>> ^Yogi:
>> ^spoco2:
So... I thought that was kinda badly done really.
If this wasn't on the sift I wouldn't have bothered watching for longer than a few seconds. The initial portion did not grab me in any way. I didn't know why I should care about the conference I was watching.
And then it was the usual heavy handed demonstration of over the top reaction to copyright infringement.
This doesn't really do anything to bolster the cause. It's been done before and better in the past.
If you're trying to get some message across on the internet, you really do have to have something to initially grab people's interest. It doesn't mean everything has to be quick fire boobs and kittens, but just something at the beginning to make me have any reason to watch further. Over a minute spent at the beginning with a boring mock press conference does not make me want to sit around any longer.
And then I did, and was treated to a mundane story. If you're going to actually get off your arses and spend the time to properly produce a nicely shot video... spend SOME time up front creating a worthwhile script that people will actually want to watch

Hey that's great, what did you do today?



The dude wrote a fuckton of text for whining about something. It's a good bet he's wasting his time and should find something better to do.

....And here we present the classic ad hominem response. For more examples please refer to the list of fallacious arguments.

>> ^Yogi:

>> ^spoco2:
So... I thought that was kinda badly done really.
If this wasn't on the sift I wouldn't have bothered watching for longer than a few seconds. The initial portion did not grab me in any way. I didn't know why I should care about the conference I was watching.
And then it was the usual heavy handed demonstration of over the top reaction to copyright infringement.
This doesn't really do anything to bolster the cause. It's been done before and better in the past.
If you're trying to get some message across on the internet, you really do have to have something to initially grab people's interest. It doesn't mean everything has to be quick fire boobs and kittens, but just something at the beginning to make me have any reason to watch further. Over a minute spent at the beginning with a boring mock press conference does not make me want to sit around any longer.
And then I did, and was treated to a mundane story. If you're going to actually get off your arses and spend the time to properly produce a nicely shot video... spend SOME time up front creating a worthwhile script that people will actually want to watch

Hey that's great, what did you do today?

>> ^spoco2:

So... I thought that was kinda badly done really.
If this wasn't on the sift I wouldn't have bothered watching for longer than a few seconds. The initial portion did not grab me in any way. I didn't know why I should care about the conference I was watching.
And then it was the usual heavy handed demonstration of over the top reaction to copyright infringement.
This doesn't really do anything to bolster the cause. It's been done before and better in the past.
If you're trying to get some message across on the internet, you really do have to have something to initially grab people's interest. It doesn't mean everything has to be quick fire boobs and kittens, but just something at the beginning to make me have any reason to watch further. Over a minute spent at the beginning with a boring mock press conference does not make me want to sit around any longer.

And then I did, and was treated to a mundane story. If you're going to actually get off your arses and spend the time to properly produce a nicely shot video... spend SOME time up front creating a worthwhile script that people will actually want to watch


Hey that's great, what did you do today?

So... I thought that was kinda badly done really.

If this wasn't on the sift I wouldn't have bothered watching for longer than a few seconds. The initial portion did not grab me in any way. I didn't know why I should care about the conference I was watching.

And then it was the usual heavy handed demonstration of over the top reaction to copyright infringement.

This doesn't really do anything to bolster the cause. It's been done before and better in the past.

If you're trying to get some message across on the internet, you really do have to have something to initially grab people's interest. It doesn't mean everything has to be quick fire boobs and kittens, but just something at the beginning to make me have any reason to watch further. Over a minute spent at the beginning with a boring mock press conference does not make me want to sit around any longer.


And then I did, and was treated to a mundane story. If you're going to actually get off your arses and spend the time to properly produce a nicely shot video... spend SOME time up front creating a worthwhile script that people will actually want to watch

Wooooooow... If i was driving the car with the camera, and i also happened to have stolen it so it wasn't my car, I'd have totally driven up his arse!

>> ^sickio:

Smile activated machine gun, well thanks Einstein for telling us it was fake.


Why don't you have a quick search for this on the web and find out just how many people DO think it's real before you are Mr snide arse.

>> ^kymbos:

Liberal use of the term 'bugger' apparently gets up the arse of kiwis.
Especially when sheep are involved.

Liberal use of the term 'bugger' apparently gets up the arse of kiwis.

it should just grow legs, this is a half-arsed attempt to not being a fish..

Interesting tack if it is viral, because while Pringles wants to reach the teens market, they don't want to be broadly associated with this kind of behaviour, even if it was faked. Tough call. I'm gonna say not viral marketing because, like most conspiracy theories, it would require too many people --including delinquent teens-- to keep quiet about it forever.

Pringles just got lucky.>> ^Dumdeedum:

If it's a viral then hopefully they faked it. If it's a viral and they didn't fake it, then I hope they get their arses sued off. Spotty delinquents being cruel to animals is one thing, companies doing it for profit is a whole different kettle of laxative-laced chips.

If it's a viral then hopefully they faked it. If it's a viral and they didn't fake it, then I hope they get their arses sued off. Spotty delinquents being cruel to animals is one thing, companies doing it for profit is a whole different kettle of laxative-laced chips.

>> ^geo321:

319


323

>> ^ChaosEngine:

Ok, I came here to post a smart arse comment about how there was only one time a ford driving around SF was awesome, but sweet monkey jesus, that was freakin' epic. Full on, throw-up-the-devil-horns awesome.
And if you've ever driven around San Fran and not wanted to do that.... you have no soul.


no, no, no. "Epic" would have been if he'd found a parking spot.