>> ^Pprt:

I'm sure you guys are smart enough to understand basic math, so here you go:
Population group A has a lower than replacement level reproduction rate.
Population group B has a higher than replacement level reproduction rate and benefits from an unlimited external source of replenishment.
The outcome is that over time, group A will cease to exist.
As it happens, some individuals in group A may be displeased about their upcoming extinction.



Pprt, you are a racist.

Both Population A and B are humans. Therefore, there are no populations A and B, just population.

If A and B are distinguished by culture, B will not replace A: They will form, what non-idiotic people might call, AB + A + B.

See you next tuesday!

>> ^StimulusMax:

This video has been one of the few things that has lessened the sadness I've felt this weekend due to the Oslo tragedy. Please don't ruin it for me.
>> ^quantumushroom:
But don't liberal beliefs there keep the public disarmed?
>> ^ChaosEngine:
Are you watching America? and particularly your so-called "left"? This is how you show strength. You do not apologise for liberal beliefs. You do not become more like your enemy to defeat him. You show them you will not bow to their misguided attempts to change you.




QM would laugh in the face of someone who just faced a horrifying tragedy...if they voted Democrat. I don't mind his beliefs about this or that, what I mind is the obvious sense I get from him that because I believe something else, I'm not a person that matters at all, that he'd rather I'd just die.

This video has been one of the few things that has lessened the sadness I've felt this weekend due to the Oslo tragedy. Please don't ruin it for me.
>> ^quantumushroom:

But don't liberal beliefs there keep the public disarmed?
>> ^ChaosEngine:
Are you watching America? and particularly your so-called "left"? This is how you show strength. You do not apologise for liberal beliefs. You do not become more like your enemy to defeat him. You show them you will not bow to their misguided attempts to change you.

>> ^Pprt:

I'm sure you guys are smart enough to understand basic math, so here you go:
Population group A has a lower than replacement level reproduction rate.
Population group B has a higher than replacement level reproduction rate and benefits from an unlimited external source of replenishment.
The outcome is that over time, group A will cease to exist.
As it happens, some individuals in group A may be displeased about their upcoming extinction.


Riiiight...he did it for the future of the Caucasian race.

Spoco was right on all points. He did it because he was a psychotic racist...and the same diagnosis holds for anyone who insists that he was right and that the only pity is that he set back the racist agenda.

You might want to reconsider your priorities in this case...I'd say the 90 murder victims are just a BIT more important than some theoretical (or more accurately, delusional) racial breeding race.

That is a perfectly acceptable comment hp.

I know I err. I admit err when it occurs and/or when someone reasonably conveys the message. In fact, I made a whole Sift Talk about where I made a mistake. No shame for me or for you either. We are bigger for admitting our mistakes. That is why I am human instead of plain dumb.

With that said, you imply prejudice where it doesn’t apply. I have not prejudged anyone or any concept. I learned of the concepts and then formed conclusions after I gathered what info I could (Mostly from real life.) I like the movement, I just don’t like those people who feed off of it for their own fuck-tard hatred and greed.

What was harsh of me was to point out that others' take my viewpoint but do it simply spoken. I used them as a shield of my POV My problem is that I go further in explaining my points, trying sometimes too hard, and perhaps insult and/or confuse more than I intend. I am not sure--the words written on the computer, in front of me, alway seem to have the best of intentions, the best message to convey---but that's eye-of-the-beholder. So if I offended, I am sorry. If I confused, I am sorry. I did not mean to. It's just cut-and-dry to me unless you can note other points that make me shift (Which is actually very easy to do.)

In response to your “Analogy fail” comment, I put “Epic Success” or some crap. Yeah, that was lame of me and not adult-like at all, but then, we both said those things to convey a point.

@StimulusMax
You note that to win you have to associate with undesirables; a slippery slope if ever I heard of one. Isn’t the Tea Party part of those “undesirable” elements the Republican Party must associate with or lose? We actually see this happening in elections around America. Without their support, both the GOP and it's candidates are bombing...Either the GOP is the friend of the Tea Party right now, or their party becomes a fractured base 3rd party; or as you say, they will belong to a Party that has no chance of succeeding...
So, why? For the same reason Christians need to hold back their rouge elements.

>> ^hpqp:
Instead of dignifying the comment below with a response, I'll let it make my point for itself.
As for pointing out your prejudicial stereotyping, my intention was not to offend or insult, but to provoke a reevaluation of your views. We all have prejudices, myself included; when I look back at the comments I made about the Oslo attacks (e.g. here), for example, I am ashamed of having jumped to a prejudice-based conclusion (and I hope I would still be even had I been right).
As some great philosopher surely said: "To err is human, but to stick it after being proven wrong is just plain dumb."
cheers
>>