Expert Michelle Bachmann says Gay Men should marry women

Exact YouTube Description -- "with a mother's patience":

Michele Bachmann showed her titanium spine at a cozy town hall meeting at the Waverly Pizza Ranch Wednesday.In a true small-town spirit, she kept her introductory remarks short, giving her audience an opportunity to quiz her on issues of interest to them, and even held the microphone so her supporters' voices could be heard as audibly as hers. But she did not hold back when a W-SR student asked her what she would do for the LGBT community as president and challenged her views on marriage."All of us as Americans have the same rights, we have the same civil rights," Bachmann told Jane Schmidt, 16, who identified herself as a member of the school's GSA, the alliance advocating for the rights of gay and straight students. "There shouldn't be any special rights or any special set of criteria," Bachmann continued. "We all have the same civil rights. "With a mother's patience and to applause, Bachmann reiterated her position that marriage is between a man and a woman.This exchange, and a later one, from the same corner, that had to do with bullying and the practicing of religion in schools, demonstrated that even in a hometown format Bachmann does not shy away from controversy.Read more in the 12/1 Waverly Democrat.by Anelia K. Dimitrova, editorcft@gmail.com
bareboards2says...

I wish to heck the student would have asked if she supported GSAs in school -- if we all have the same civil rights, then the right to assembly and free speech is protected, right?

Missed opportunity. Dang.

lantern53says...

She is 100% right. Why do we need federal bureaucrats in Washington DC set any kind of policy for people in Oklahoma? Don't the people in Oklahoma have enough brains to do it themselves?

notarobotsays...

"Government only sensors religious speech in schools, why is that?"

The US was founded on a principle of separating church and state. (I think there's something somewhere in the US constitution about that, somewhere after "all men are created equal" maybe?) The state has taken responsibility to ensure that all citizens can access a certain minimum of education regardless of background. Therefore, religion is left out of the state funded education.

I'm not even American and I know that; and lady, if you don't, you aren't qualified to run the country.

petpeevedsays...

lantern wrote" "She is 100% right. Why do we need federal bureaucrats in Washington DC set any kind of policy for people in Oklahoma? Don't the people in Oklahoma have enough brains to do it themselves?"

The fact that we largely fought a Civil War over the rights of states to continue the practice of slavery should be enough evidence that local governments are not always able to govern objectively or fairly in accordance with our Constitution.

Porksandwichsays...

I just wish they let the gays marry already, because honestly it really doesn't effect anything beyond some people being offended. And I could really give a damn. As long as they don't take gay marriage as some sort of sign to be out all public display of affectioning every chance they get, don't care at all. And that's not even a bash against two guys/girls PDAing, I just don't like seeing massive PDA stuff going on in public locations. You really don't need to be making out, grab assing and trying to head to second or third base while everyone watches. It's not even the grab ass, it's just they are in the way or moving too slowly because they are too busy trying to stick their tongues down each others throats. Same opinion on cell phone addicts, put it away or move out of the way so you stop holding everyone up.

Plus, if they allow gay marriage, Im hoping we can finally stop hearing about it. If they want to marry a lamp, let em marry a damn lamp. Besides I see "marriage" as a religious institution backed by government, they could just as easily have partnerships or bonded pairs or ball and chain mean the same thing as marriage in the view of the law. And while it wouldn't technically be marriage in the religious sense, they'd still have all the rights for insurance coverage etc. Because if these religions supported gay marriage we wouldn't have all these "Christians" running on a platform of stopping gay marriage, so bypass religion, get your rights under another name refer to it as marriage because in the eyes of the law it would be the same.

Marriage to me means you need a piece of paper and a ring to say you care, but I do recognize that having legal bonds might be beneficial for ownership, insurance, and medical emergency choices. They should focus on their legal bonds, stop referring to it as marriage to appease these ignorant assholes and then after it's in place call it whatever the hell they want. And then promptly stop talking about it, it's important to them I realize but man.....both sides are beating that drum like it's a very important topic that has long lasting ramifications. It doesn't unless you want it to.

Besides the way I see it, more gays married. Less Maury "You ARE the father" shows. And I think that's a win for everyone.

Yogisays...

I'm starting to think that it's too much work to try and help this country out of it's idiocy. How's europe doing? Is Sweden or Germany a better alternative for thinking people?

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More