I liked her better when she was Sarah Palin.

*commercial

Adding video to channels (Commercial) - requested by NetRunner.

wtf!?! a tommy gun?!

Vote Pamela Gorman, she keeps it Gangster.

though

Yet another sifter that thinks that owning a computer makes them smart?

>> ^maximillian:

though
Yet another sifter that thinks that owning a computer makes them smart?


oh hush, like you never made a spelling error.

..nancy nitpicker

>> ^kronosposeidon:

I liked her better when she was Sarah Palin.


Actually, side by side, she is FAR better looking than Palin. I really feel like Palin's "good looks" were quite exaggerated. This chick, I'd do.

>> ^maximillian:

though
Yet another sifter that thinks that owning a computer makes them smart?


Yet another douche-bag that thinks that finding a spelling error allows them to make sweeping generalizations about a poster...

>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:

>> ^maximillian:
though
Yet another sifter that thinks that owning a computer makes them smart?

oh hush, like you never made a spelling error.
..nancy nitpicker


Not when criticizing someone on their intelligence.

>> ^ponceleon:

>> ^maximillian:
though
Yet another sifter that thinks that owning a computer makes them smart?

Yet another douche-bag that thinks that finding a spelling error allows them to make sweeping generalizations about a poster...


Pot, kettle....

*brief

This video has been flagged as being less than 1 minute in length - declared brief by Zifnab.

>> ^maximillian:

>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:
>> ^maximillian:
though
Yet another sifter that thinks that owning a computer makes them smart?

oh hush, like you never made a spelling error.
..nancy nitpicker

Not when criticizing someone on their intelligence.


What does someone's intelligence have to do with a typo? Even the smartest people in the world are capable of a typo or two.

That said, what in the world makes this woman think just because she can fire a weapon, this qualifies her as a good candidate?

>> ^Duckman33:

That said, what in the world makes this woman think just because she can fire a weapon, this qualifies her as a good candidate?


Well, she know more than many judges and 4 of the SCOTUS justices:

http://www.southcoasttoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100311/NEWS/3110340

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/28/AR2010062802134.html?hpid=topnews

>> ^ponceleon:


Actually, side by side, she is FAR better looking than Palin. I really feel like Palin's "good looks" were quite exaggerated. This chick, I'd do.


Ok, but who's the better shot? Only one way to find out: duel at dawn!

This needs Wilhelm:

She actually looks like a horrible shot. She's firing all over the place with the 1st handgun. 20degrees difference is a lot.

That's some *terrible *comedy, and so is this thread hijacking you've allowed maximillian to pull off.

Adding video to channels (Comedy, Terrible) - requested by Kevlar.

It's damn scary reading her write about this video and all the great ultra conservative stuff she's done.

Urgh, people like this scare the pants of me. (make of that as you will)

knows

Also, it's proper to spell the numeral if it's less than ten, so "4" was incorrectly used.
>> ^maximillian:

Well, she know more than many judges and 4 of the SCOTUS justices:
http://www.southcoasttoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100
311/NEWS/3110340
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/
article/2010/06/28/AR2010062802134.html?hpid=topnews

*promote

Promoting this video back to the front page; last published Wednesday, June 30th, 2010 5:40am PDT - promote requested by kronosposeidon.

"done know" also insert "dang nabbit" at the end.
>> ^thinker247:

knows
Also, it's proper to spell the numeral if it's less than ten, so "4" was incorrectly used.
>> ^maximillian:

Well, she know more than many judges and 4 of the SCOTUS justices:
http://www.southcoasttoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100
311/NEWS/3110340
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/
article/2010/06/28/AR2010062802134.html?hpid=topnews

>> ^maximillian:

>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:
>> ^maximillian:
though
Yet another sifter that thinks that owning a computer makes them smart?

oh hush, like you never made a spelling error.
..nancy nitpicker

Not when criticizing someone on their intelligence.


Haha, fucking hell. What kind of intelligence must you have if you believe that typos are an indication of it? Get off your high horse why dontcha.

Did someone get Lisa Simpson to approve that message?

I fapped to this... vote for meee.

>> ^alien_concept:
Haha, fucking hell. What kind of intelligence must you have if you believe that typos are an indication of it? Get off your high horse why dontcha.
Did someone get Lisa Simpson to approve that message?


QED

Yet another sifter pedantically looking for typos, because he has nothing else to do. Youtube has a far better selection of people who don't spell well, and I'm sure they'll be happy to be corrected. Everyone loves to be corrected.
>> ^maximillian:

though
Yet another sifter that thinks that owning a computer makes them smart?

>> ^gwiz665:

Everyone loves to be corrected.>

Then why the negativity? The error of the original poster has been corrected. Do you feel a duty to be the 7th person to criticize me for the same thing?

Actually, I am very tolerant when someone misspells or uses improper grammar. The point of my original comment was to show the irony of the article submitter. By using this one video Lann in essence called this candidate ignorant. As obtuse as this video is, I am sure she is not ignorant.

>> ^maximillian:

>> ^gwiz665:
Everyone loves to be corrected.>
Then why the negativity? The error of the original poster has been corrected. Do you feel a duty to be the 7th person to criticize me for the same thing?
Actually, I am very tolerant when someone misspells or uses improper grammar. The point of my original comment was to show the irony of the article submitter. By using this one video Lann in essence called this candidate ignorant. As obtuse as this video is, I am sure she is not ignorant.


Shut the fuck up.

I'll admit that last comment came after I'd watched the 100 movie insults video

>> ^Deano:

I'll admit that last comment came after I'd watched the 100 movie insults video


#8, Dipshit. Just watched it too.

My sarcasm creator wasn't turned on high enough on that last part. The point of my comment was not to criticize you for correcting someone, but for the way in which you did it. Patronizing, assuming ignorance for a typo. It's fine to correct, but don't be a dick about it.
>> ^maximillian:

>> ^gwiz665:
Everyone loves to be corrected.>
Then why the negativity? The error of the original poster has been corrected. Do you feel a duty to be the 7th person to criticize me for the same thing?
Actually, I am very tolerant when someone misspells or uses improper grammar. The point of my original comment was to show the irony of the article submitter. By using this one video Lann in essence called this candidate ignorant. As obtuse as this video is, I am sure she is not ignorant.

>> ^gwiz665:

My sarcasm creator wasn't turned on high enough on that last part. The point of my comment was not to criticize you for correcting someone, but for the way in which you did it. Patronizing, assuming ignorance for a typo. It's fine to correct, but don't be a dick about it.


My criticism of the OP is that he implied ignorance to Ms. Gorman from this one video without knowing her. Then he makes a simple and obvious error. I pointed this out not because of the simple spelling error but because of the irony of the situation. Apparently there are too many people reading this thread that can't grasp this simple concept.

Personally, go right ahead and criticize me. I don't care because I know the caliber of the typical reader on this site.

The thing is, it's not really ironic. It's a pretty safe assumption from this video alone that this woman IS your typical garden-variety, ignorant, know-nothing, religiotard, fundamentalist Right-winger. She'd maybe say something of her actual politics if she had anything substantial to offer besides "Me Jane. Me shoot em stuff reel gud! Me also pretty; me have value. Vote Jane."

The same really can't be said of a simple typo. It's apples to oranges.

She's an opportunistic weasel woman.

Vote for that woman if you're rich or a gun freak.

Otherwise, she'll shit on you at her own convenience.

The southwest of America is half filled with skanks like her.

Whoah... wait... this is real?

That's it. I'm out.

I wasn’t going to say anything because I would just be repeating what everyone else here has been saying....but fuck it.

First off, thanks for the catch on the typo maximillian! Without you I would have gone throughout life thinking “tough” was spelt “though” because by calling me ignorant based on a TYPO that must have been what you really assumed. You know, being articulate doesn’t save one from ignorance either.

I’m sure she’s downplaying herself here to portray that down home, gun toting, country girl image. Yeah...I don’t know a lot about this broad but she took the time and effort to create this stupid video. When I first saw this it read like a cheap car sales add. I mean look at her shoot away those high taxes!

Also, I am a female who grew up hunting and shooting guns in rural Montana. None of that made me more qualified for ANYTHING in life. I think women everyone should be admired for what they do in life…but being rich and buying guns and shooting them in the air isn’t really admirable or a good show of qualifications IMO.

Shooting expensive guns doesn’t make anyone more bad ass or though tough. Exactly why I put "yawn" as a tag…Lann is not impressed

>> ^rougy:


The southwest of America is half filled with skanks like her.


Sadly they are not exclusive to the southwest.

I wouldn't vote for her... she doesn't have a truck!

I don't think anyone would mind if the banstick were employed somewhere north of this comment.

Do Republicans use violent rhetoric? NO! Let this showcase their *quality conservative values. And in Arizona, if you can imagine it.

And to those of you who think it's in bad taste for me to promote this right now - go to hell. I'm just a messenger; I didn't make this shit. If you don't like it, take it up with Pamela Gorman, or Sarah Palin, or Glenn Beck, or Rush Limbaugh, or Bill O'Reilly, or Liz Trotta, or....

Boosting this quality contribution up in the Hot Listing - declared quality by kronosposeidon.

Yup, certainly reflects more strongly in light of recent events.

I don't know who is responsible for returning these ancient sifts to the queue, in order to join the lamestream media in trying to pin the murderous actions of a lone, mentally-ill vermin on Sarah Palin, the Tea Party or the Right. In a more perfect world you would feel shame, but bolsheviks eat, sleep and breathe lies. Twenty or even ten years ago you might have gotten away with it, but not now. Team Soros has no traction with the majority any more.

"Lone, mentally-ill vermin". With deference to @bareboards2, I'll quote Stephen Budianski:

"For as long as I can remember, I have heard conservatives blaming everything that is wrong in the universe, from violent crime to declining test scores to teen pregnancy to rude children to declining patriotism to probably athlete's foot... upon Dr. Spock, Hollywood liberals, the abolition of prayer in school, Bill Clinton, the "liberal 1960s," the teaching of evolution — in other words, upon symbols, rhetoric, cultural norms, and the values expressed by political and media leaders. Yet from the moment when someone gets a gun in their hands, apparently, society ceases to have any influence whatsoever on the outcome and individual responsibility takes hold 100%. Something is driving the tripling of death threats against congressmen (and the concomitant rise in threats against Federal judges and other villains of the right, from Forest Service rangers to climate scientists) and it isn't the sunspot cycle."

http://budiansky.blogspot.com/2011/01/not-us-cont.html

Hear, hear!

Great quote, kymbos!

>> ^kymbos:

"Lone, mentally-ill vermin". With deference to @<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/bareboards2" title="member since July 3rd, 2009" class="profilelink"><strong style="color: rgb(0, 136, 0);">bareboards2, I'll quote Stephen Budianski:
"For as long as I can remember, I have heard conservatives blaming everything that is wrong in the universe, from violent crime to declining test scores to teen pregnancy to rude children to declining patriotism to probably athlete's foot... upon Dr. Spock, Hollywood liberals, the abolition of prayer in school, Bill Clinton, the "liberal 1960s," the teaching of evolution — in other words, upon symbols, rhetoric, cultural norms, and the values expressed by political and media leaders. Yet from the moment when someone gets a gun in their hands, apparently, society ceases to have any influence whatsoever on the outcome and individual responsibility takes hold 100%. Something is driving the tripling of death threats against congressmen (and the concomitant rise in threats against Federal judges and other villains of the right, from Forest Service rangers to climate scientists) and it isn't the sunspot cycle."
http://budiansky.blogspot.com/2011/01/not-us-cont.html

Damn! Why do my quotations always do this?

he didnt post the video, retard. sorry for missing the apostrophe. ugh, how ironic that i call you a retard when even a retard would know there is an appstrophe in "dont"!

oh god, i misspelled apostrophe. i mean a retard probably couldnt spell that so maybe im in the clear?

oh man i didn load all the comments and respondedti an old one oh man this is so ironic etc

*dead Embedding disabled by request

This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by jimnms.

I guess she didn't want to share her blowing away those high taxes...

*backup=[...snipped...]

Added alternate embed code for this video - backup requested by gwiz665.