Vote Snowballing and Countermeasures
The Trouble is that ranking order determines the number of views, which determines the vote count, which determines the ranking order. This is self-reinforcing, and amplifies random noise such as the number of people who were online at the time the video was submitted. To get a more accurate ranking of videos there are some countermeasures we might try:
0. Introduce some randomness to the default sort order
1. Each view of a video (from a distinct user) subtracts a small fraction from its vote count
2. Only videos found through searching or "random" mode can be voted. If a user arrives at a video through a top-list, he cannot vote for it. Videosift doesn't have enough traffic volume to try this approach, but YT does.
3 Comments
Weighting the votes is an interesting idea, however it may seem unfair at times.
Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)
I also like that idea, so 3 votes by top 15 members would be more likely to push to the front page when using "hot" mode than 10 votes by non-starred. Though it is kind of a "stealth vote" system.
The front page and top sifts are so full of goodness, that it's easy to spend all your time there, while ignoring the unsifted. What kind of incentive could be offered to people who spend their time actively sifting fresh videos?
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.