The background's a wee bit shaky & the video's maker needs to work on that one, but the artistic merit has won me over, so.......

*quality

Boosting this quality contribution up in the Hot Listing - declared quality by Barseps.

Misnomer; should be: Women of rich husbands/fathers through the ages, at least the first two thirds. (I'm just saying this to go against the romanticised notion conveyed in this video that women of the past wore nice dresses and jewellery. Just as today, only accurate for a very small percentage.)

True. But not the first few moments, yeah?


>> ^DerHasisttot:

Misnomer; should be: Women of rich husbands/fathers through the ages, at least the first two thirds. (I'm just saying this to go against the romanticised notion conveyed in this video that women of the past wore nice dresses and jewellery. Just as today, only accurate for a very small percentage.)

>> ^bareboards2:

True. But not the first few moments, yeah?

>> ^DerHasisttot:
Misnomer; should be: Women of rich husbands/fathers through the ages, at least the first two thirds. (I'm just saying this to go against the romanticised notion conveyed in this video that women of the past wore nice dresses and jewellery. Just as today, only accurate for a very small percentage.)



hehe, yeah. Although... twigs and moss and curiously absent

Great idea, and stunning model, but execution very lacking. It's not that hard to have a tripod that is not moved around and a properly static background and reference marks to make your model actually be bang on the same spot each shot.

Still... nice idea

80`s surely were a lowpoint...

Meh, seemed overly stereotypical to me.

Plus, for a montage that aims to start ~4000 years ago, the 20th century styles shouldn't start halfway through it.

Height of fashion through the eras!

Rich, Western European.

I still liked it
>> ^DerHasisttot:

Misnomer; should be: Women of rich husbands/fathers through the ages, at least the first two thirds. (I'm just saying this to go against the romanticised notion conveyed in this video that women of the past wore nice dresses and jewellery. Just as today, only accurate for a very small percentage.)

>> ^oritteropo:

Rich, Western European.
I still liked it
>> ^DerHasisttot:
Misnomer; should be: Women of rich husbands/fathers through the ages, at least the first two thirds. (I'm just saying this to go against the romanticised notion conveyed in this video that women of the past wore nice dresses and jewellery. Just as today, only accurate for a very small percentage.)



and east european/north african

Christ you are all so huffy... it was a nice little montage. Why you gotta be so negative?

I think only one of the above comments means someone didn't like it though, the rest of us enjoyed watching it, then enjoyed picking it to pieces discussing it.>> ^ponceleon:

Christ you are all so huffy... it was a nice little montage. Why you gotta be so negative?