*lies

Adding video to channels (Lies) - requested by Norsuelefantti.

the timing is off on the 2 videos , first vidoe looks like its a photo thats had the ball added to it animated and then they filmed that off a TFT screen to get camara shake , allso added sound to it.

pritty well done

There was a cut in the second video, so the timing won't be matchable.

Meh. I'm just not going to believe any of these videos are real until I shoot one myself.

I fail to see how this qualifies for the lies or debunked channels. There is no debunking going on here nor is there any proof of anyone lying about anything....

A crappy camera taking video at night with a closed 6-blade aperture (as evidenced by the starshaped lights)? Real my ass. Consumer cameras rarely even have apertures, and keeping it closed in the dark is only something you do for long exposures (several seconds) to create that star effect, necessitating a tripod. In addition you can see the interference patterns when they zoom in, indicating that they were filming a computer screen or projected image (my guess is the former). Absolutely no other movement in the image aside from the white blob and the camera shake. And did I hear someone speak Mandarin Chinese in the background? Is that common in Jerusalem? American and Chinese tourists hanging out at the same spot?

Not a very well done hoax. It doesn't take much to fake a couple of camera shots like that. And I'd definitely say * lies.

As you can imagine the ytufo nuts think its real, even tho the photo among other things was tracked down in minutes after it was released. Thats what you get when you base your reality on a belief system and not fact.

The motion blur on the ball is completely different from the blur on the other objects in the first camera's field of view. Also, when the camera moves rapidly you can see the field lines on every object but the floating ball.

Conclusion: it was added as a post effect by someone who wasn't terribly skilled. Probably the other video has a similar story but once one is debunked, why bother with the other.

I do like how the guy in the second video says, "whoa!" an instant BEFORE it moves.

Mchurglork: Honey, it says here in the guidebook that there is a famous human landmark below us.
Rh'knobknorp: Cool. Let's check it out.
Mchurglork: Is that it? Just a primitive religious structure?
Rh'knobknorp: Booooooring!
Mchurglork: Yeah, let's get out of here and go check out that naked singularity in the Drux Sfnigfhort quadrant.

Easy debunk of the second video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHOc35nmUDk
They stabilised the video and bumped up brightness... it shows EASILY how badly the horizon is motion matched to the foreground.

FAIL people... FAIL

Other view debunk: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5s78wr0UF0

Which mentions something which I saw straight away, the grid pattern from shooting a video looking at a screen.

Pft, it's clearly a streetlamp.

We should start a war over this outrage to our faiths!

>> ^Drachen_Jager:

The motion blur on the ball is completely different from the blur on the other objects in the first camera's field of view. Also, when the camera moves rapidly you can see the field lines on every object but the floating ball.
Conclusion: it was added as a post effect by someone who wasn't terribly skilled. Probably the other video has a similar story but once one is debunked, why bother with the other.
I do like how the guy in the second video says, "whoa!" an instant BEFORE it moves.


I was going to point this out as it wouldn't be hard to figure out the velocity of said object. It appears to be different when falling and shooting up on both. As noted the second had an edit which I would assume, if real, you'd keep (might have been the news station, but they never said why).

P.S. - Shooting up on the second, it would certainly have issues with an inertia change of that magnitude. Otherwise I'm going for a retarded ball lightning that is amazingly stable!

Personally, when I first saw this video I thought of the Hexakopter video, specifically the rapid vertical ascent part. I guess I've just been wanting one ever since I first saw it.

>> ^teebeenz:

As you can imagine the ytufo nuts think its real, even tho the photo among other things was tracked down in minutes after it was released. Thats what you get when you base your reality on a belief system and not fact.


I'm pretty sure it's a fact that we are not the only intelligent life in the universe. If you think otherwise you are both ignorant and arrogant.