Moving this video to PlayhousePals's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

*cute *music *timeshift

Adding video to channels (Cute, Music, Timeshift) - requested by ant.

How did this not get alot of votes? What is happening to this site???

*promote *quality

Boosting this quality contribution up in the Hot Listing - declared quality by campionidelmondo.

Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued - promote requested by campionidelmondo.

Well that was really well done. Nice camera angles and music.

Everyone has been BUSY lately.

I watched it out of boredom. Seen too many animals on skateboards/waterski videos, but then got surprised at how well done it actually was.

I don't recall the moment in Videosift history that you're referencing.

You could probably write a Videosift web crawler that determines the moment that cat videos and boobs became popular, but I think it will likely determine that they have always been popular.

10 votes to determine quality control is too small of a value, UNLESS downvoting were used less sparingly.

But no one really downvotes as a form gating, they mainly downvote as an extreme action towards something they strongly disagree with. For example, ant downvoting things that are verbally vulgar. Well, what if you and everyone who felt that cat videos and boobs were poor quality, what if you guys downvoted as a rule to maintain quality control?

If you guys did that, you'd see something closer to the utopia of quality you think somehow magically occurs. It would then follow that, if sifters followed this method for maintaining quality, the Sift would have higher standards for Top 15.

Unless that is already happening, and people of value (to be defined) actually believe this is a video that is worthy. Clearly, by the rules and inputs available, even you agree that this video is worthy. Otherwise there would be AT LEAST one downvote.

You complained but failed a call to action. Figured I'd help you better understand how democratic systems work, and how lack of appropriate participation degrades quality of that democratic system over time, as potential voters cease to vote as needed to maintain quality.

As the number of votes it now has would suggest, it simply didn't get noticed immediately.

The title underplays just how damned good this particular skateboarding cat is, even by skateboarding cat standards. I only watched it because it's in the top 15.

Title should have been "Skateboarding cat - Actually really good!"