I... don't know what to think.

I think it's yet another one of those annoying pornos where they have a heap of 'proper' content wrapped around the porn. So rather than doing what it's supposed to, which is turn you (and your partner if there) on, it instead keeps interrupting with a 'real' movie. Except they're always bad 'real' movies... so all you get is bits you want to fast forward.

And even if they're half decent... you watch normal movies for that, not porn.

Instead of this trend of higher budgets and better production values for porn (not that this is an example of a high budget, I was thinking Pirates for that)... what about making porn that's actually sensual and sexy and respectful of woman while still being darn hot.

I'm sick of movies which are touted as the next new thing in porn only to find they're big budget films which still treat women like objects and degrade them and don't show them getting pleasure. Focusing on gagging and gaping and slapping and forcing and...urgh, such a turnoff.

It's a sorry state of affairs that as porn seems to become more mainstream it becomes less and less female friendly.

Its bad enough I imagine canned laughter whilst...

..and it's equally as unfunny as the original

spoco2:
I disagree about some of your points. I think that either getting real movies to include real sex or getting porn to the point where the acting really is good are both worthwhile. Sex should not be taboo, it is an awesome, hot, fun thing and showing it in movies, in all its sticky glory, should not be an issue.

I want to kill everyone involved with this. The End.

It's nothing to do with it being an issue with sex... it's to do with, really, when you and your partner, or just you alone, are putting some porn in the dvd player, are you really, seriously wanting to sit through plot? Good or otherwise, it's not why you're there, it's not why your watching porn.

To have some lead in to the sex, to give some context to build some sexual tension is GOOD... to pretty much STOP all sexual feeling and have some comedy/action is just ridiculous.

There's no issue with there being a great film with some great sex in it, but porn has a purpose, it's purpose is to get being hot under the collar and either rearing to do things to each other, or for a solo party to enjoy themselves more than if they had nothing to watch.

Telling a story, telling jokes, doing an action sequence are all absolutely ridiculous in that context.

And again, it's all moot if all you're going to have is the same horrible sex when it gets to that part anyway. Nothings a turnoff more for me than seeing a woman do something she doesn't seem to want to do, and the whole 'gagging on a dick', especially when done by the man holding her head onto his dick is horrible and just ruins whatever mood there was.

>> ^necrontyr:
spoco2:
I disagree about some of your points. I think that either getting real movies to include real sex or getting porn to the point where the acting really is good are both worthwhile. Sex should not be taboo, it is an awesome, hot, fun thing and showing it in movies, in all its sticky glory, should not be an issue.

Some girls like that kind of thing. It's only degrading if you choose to interpret it that way.

I also don't watch porn and have no idea what the ratio is of guys giving head vs. girls giving head, but I'll take your word for it and agree it's unbalanced. But I have seen a porn website where the only videos they show are ones of the expressions of girls faces while orgasming. And that's it, just the girl's face and nothing else.

Nevertheless, reading erotica is way better!

>> ^Raaagh:
Its bad enough I imagine canned laughter whilst...


no, >> ^shole:
..and it's equally as unfunny as the original


no I meant while jerking off.

Holy shit! This is real?

The difference between 'pornography' and 'erotica' is that pornography involves an imbalance of power between the 'actors.' That's what I was told in a sociology class on sexuality anyways.


Anyways, as I understand it, the reason pornos have the plot parts is because that was necessary for them to be legal (in the past at least). Just sex would have been "pornography" and illegal, but if you work a stupid little story in there, you could argue that it has some sort of artistic value as a work of fiction. I believe that's also why Playboy went out of its way to have some very impressive talent write articles for it. I have indeed actually bought a Playboy before "for the articles." No really. I have.

Those were some really good impersonations. Great casting, great voice coaching, great scriptwriting.

@^spoco2
Softcore always turns out to be something better to watch with a partner, partially for the the better plotlines, and partially because it leaves more to the imagination and adds to foreplay.

"Napoleon.. you know why he had so much trouble? Because he was right at boob level."

That actually made me LOL and sounds like Seinfeld material.

Double penetration is hot, I'm 8 by 6 and my ex was 9 by 7 and we doubled dicked a friend of mine. Hot, he took both of us like true bottom.