QI - Taking Bets on Heaven's Existence

Bidoulerouxsays...

>> ^ajkido:

I can't believe somebody found a new angle (for me at least) into this matter. Doesn't surprise it was David Mitchell, though.

It's not a new angle, it's simply ignoring/bypassing the parameters of the wager. It's actually the only reasonable answer to it (without going into the theological debates, which are pointless anyway since Pascal made it clear that his wager was only something atheists could even consider taking because of the whole "sincerity of belief" thing the other guy mentioned). As for the novelty of Mitchell's answer, Voltaire already responded to the wager in much the same way, i.e. by making fun of Pascal himself and of the whole idea of an atheist wagering on something he believes doesn't exist in the first place. Like they say, the only way to win is not to play.

FlowersInHisHairsays...

It's a new comedic angle though.

Personally I disagree with Pascal not simply because Yahweh is supposed to be able to read minds and tell if you're faking, but because I reckon you do have something to lose in this life if you bet that there is a god and spend your time worshipping it. You lose time (best spent appreciating the only life that you're ever going to have) by fixating on some future life somewhere else that probably doesn't exist.

siftbotsays...

Tags for this video have been changed from 'stephen fry, david mitchell, sean lock, cream cakes, sod off' to 'stephen fry, david mitchell, sean lock, cream cakes, sod off, pascals wager' - edited by radx

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More