Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
19 Comments
therealblankmansays...Fuck all y'all homophobic religious conservative hating zealots. "Traditional" marriage was first, last and always about property. Most of us today see it differently... first, last and always as being about love.
'nuff said.
nibiyabisays...*election08
siftbotsays...Adding video to channels (Election08) - requested by nibiyabi.
nickreal03says...Can we please lower our IQ a bit more. I think otherwise the video does not make sense.
RedSkysays...That right kids, if a concept is too difficult for a child to understand let's outlaw it!
westysays...well for a start if this was a gay cuple thay would have just beaten the kid so i think its unfair on the gay comunity
Diogenessays...although i'm in favor of non-traditional unions--both homosexual *and* polygamous marriage, etc--i guess i see the arguing of *this* particular point to be moot
the point of contention is clearly the *ability* to procreate, rather than the *necessity* of the same
for argument's sake, take a look at the statutes of some u.s. states' vehicle codes...
in illinois, for example, all light trucks have to be registered as payload-bearing vehicles, and are even issued special license plates which depict a lower-case 'b' on the tag
does this mean that driving your light truck in illinois *without* a payload is illegal?
imho, there are stronger arguments in favor of non-traditional marriage than this quasi-strawman
if i had my druthers, we'd SETTLE THIS silly *marriage* issue ONCE AND FOR ALL... meaning that we completely do away with ANY and ALL barriers to ANYONE and EVERYONE, of an appropriate age (whatever that means), marrying for WHATEVER reason
it just seems to me that fighting this very emotional and exhausting political and moral battle *more than once* is inefficient and costly, both in time and money
having researched the history of marriage from its earliest conceptualization up to modern times, the history of the the advent of "romantic love" and its media inculcation over time, as well as the relatively recent disenfranchising (the last 100 years or so) of the rights of young adults--think for a second... if it's *immoral* to deny recognition of a homosexual union, then who are we to say (and why) that, say, two 14-17 year-olds cannot have their "love" recognized without social outcry and parental permission (stop and think of how much progeny has sprung from teenage "marriages" and "procreation" since time immemorial... i find the whole sorry mess to be based largely on ignorance
gay marriage has my support, but i'd be greatly disappointed if all this cacophony were to simply allow this *particular* group to attain satisfaction and *then* draw a moral line *behind* themselves
braindonutsays...OH SNAP! I got wtfpwnt. Let's not confuse our kids! What wonderful reasoning. I've been put squarely in my place.
I should probably hide all the literature other than the bible, too. Don't want them seeing anything too confusing.
We certaintly wouldn't want our children to NOT grow up to be smacktards...
NordlichReitersays...Marriage is between a person and their lolcats.
Yes ... cats, with an S.
Marriage is between a *insert Meme like phrase here*.
ponceleonsays...>> ^NordlichReiter:
Marriage is between a person and their lolcats.
Yes ... cats, with an S.
Marriage is between a insert Meme like phrase here .
Im in ur famili unitz confuzin ur kidz?
K0MMIEsays..."A very shallow and predictable piece of propaganda from you know who."
Voldemort?
Trancecoachsays...Since when is the purpose of marriage to have kids?!? I know of many married and nonmarried hetero and homsexual parents and nonparents. Marriage is about legal rights and dignities, and it's about a relationship based on love.
This kid needs to stay the f*#k out of Megan's business.
Trancecoachsays...Oh, and *terrible
siftbotsays...Adding video to channels (Terrible) - requested by Trancecoach.
rottenseedsays..."Then what's marriage for?"
"it's a business agreement between two individuals"
there, both the truth and simple enough for a child to understand. What's the big fucking deal?
quantumushroomsays...Why didn't they just shout at her, that's how liberals usually "win" arugments.
MaxWildersays...Think you got that backwards there, qm.
HollywoodBobsays...Instead of "maybe we shouldn't spend so much time with Megan" whispered, it should have have been "Megan's an idiot and her mommy and daddy are assholes who would lynch your daddies if given the opportunity". Remember it's never to early to teach your kids that morons and bigots are not to be tolerated.
rougysays...>> ^quantumushroom:
Why didn't they just shout at her, that's how liberals usually "win" arugments.
What was that noise? Sounded like a rat skittering round a corner.
And what is that sudden, flatulent odor?
Oh! I know! QM decided to make an appearance.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.