Congress shallmake no law respecting an establishment of religion, orprohibitingthe free exercisethereof; or abridgingthe freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Just some minor changes. Nothing to worry about.

"America's Congress, notoriously known for it's bickering, ironically reached consensus when it came to clamping down on constituents."

I'm worried...but they can't stop all of us.

>> ^Yogi:

I'm worried...but they can't stop all of us.


They will try.

*promote

Promoting this video back to the front page; last published Monday, March 19th, 2012 10:49am PDT - promote requested by lavoll.

This fucked up system can't stop all of us, more accurately. Request a jury trial.

http://www.kimatv.com/news/Weve-got-to-find-a-way-to-limit-the-number-of-jury-trials-139924863.html

Let's skip over the lawlessness and millions of "the 99%'s" taxpayer dollars wasted arresting the rabble and cleaning up the feces, and get to the point:

The housing/economic collapse is the result of idiot carter and liberals deciding in the 70s that "everyone" should have a house whether they can afford one or not. The same sh1t law, the "Community Reinvestment Act" was strengthened by idiot clinton.

What did these fking idiots think the banks would do when ORDERED to lend money to anybody, and don't worry, big govt has your backs and will make everything "risk-free"?

Well here we are, and true to form, the banks, complicit in this socialist scheme, got a nice payout from the taxpayers.

I want to kill the thieving motherfkers as much as anyone, but why blame the banks when it was government that created this "fairness" bullsh1te to buy votes, and enriched banks with promises of "no-risk" investments and threats if they didn't comply?

In essence, the occupoopers are demanding government institute fairness at gunpoint, as a reaction to a needless crisis caused by...government fairness at gunpoint.

@quantummushroom

your argument falls on it's face.
if the CRA was forcing banks to make loans to minorities, why were they making liars loans and other fraudlent loans? There was no forcing, just greed.

Could post some joke about "the land of the free" or something, but this is some serious and scary shit

@EvilDeathBee

don't worry when americans start educating themselves, everything's going to be fine

LOL I love how bias RT is.

there anti captlist messages and the way they structure things is halrouse its like a inversion of fox news.

Still allot of what RT covers is true and its nice to have a different bias view piont on things, one other thing they do which is nice is long interviews without interruptions.

Evan though allot of the pieces they do are totally mental with an obvious agenda it can be quite refreshing , "the real news network" however offers the same thing without the bullshit though and unlike 99% of RT content I dont have to take the information from RNN with a table spoon of salt.

The three dissenters against HR 347 were Rep.Paul Broun R-Georgia, Rep. Justin Amash R-Michigan and Rep. Keith Ellison D-Minnesota.

Ron Paul voted nay against the original bill and abstained for the bill that passed - not sure why but maybe he was absent?


Just FYI

How are we the politicians' constituents when they clearly do not represent us?

because HEY LOOK OVER THERE