Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
11 Comments
1stSingularitysays...Buh... Wa?
This is why math wins.
marinarasays...Damn good! if everyone could do this we'd see more this good, but I never have.
djsunkidsays...This is INCREDIBLE! Holy WHAT!
*quality to the MAX!
siftbotsays...Boosting this quality contribution up in the Hot Listing - declared quality by djsunkid.
Ryjkyjsays...Wow, if you watch dead center for a minute or two and then pause it the image will start to shrink.
westysays...lol Video sift has turned into jelly , its like playing guitar hero for an hour.
Paybacksays...The little chorus line of dancing guys in bear suits was cool.
Throbbinsays...That was SOOOO extreme!
siftbotsays...There is no pornography allowed on the Sift.
...or is it just me?
lampishthingsays...Bold Dag! Bold!>> ^siftbot:
There is no pornography allowed on the Sift.
...or is it just me?
Croccydilesays...The description is actually quite spot on. Most commercial fractal software would have died a painful death at around the 1:00 mark from lack of enough precision. Double precision can represent incredibly large/small numbers, but only have 16 significant digits. You need heavy duty math that can go way beyond this. Another issue is with incredibly deep zooms, there are more iterations needed to "see" what is down that far, and this takes even more computer time.
If the final zoom is really in the realm of 1 x 10^-214 I have no doubt even a modern computer would take a very long time to render each frame, as there would likely be billions of iterations to see that far down.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.