*promote The Truth of The Donald.

What a horrible telling story of a horrible man

Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Saturday, June 18th, 2016 9:15am PDT - promote requested by bareboards2.

*controversy

Adding video to channels (Controversy) - requested by MrFisk.

You know that when THIS guy is the voice of reason, the country needs to reevaluate its choices.

Lulz, great minds.

I was going to say "You know, when Charlie Sheen thinks YOU are a whack job..."

When you find yourself believing an unverified story by Charlie Sheen because it fits your confirmation bias, you know you've sunk to a new low.

Meh, believing anything Trump says isn't any different.

This comment really should have received more upvotes.

The spirit of the comment was too pro-Trump.

It's like upvoting one of Trump comments because he actually said something factual about Omar Mateen. It's correct, but you still feel dirty doing it.

My comment wasn't in the slightest pro-Trump.

It was definitely anti-confirmation bias. The target of the confirmation bias is irrelevant. Charlie Sheen could have been talking about Clinton and I would have written the same thing.

Trump, and whether you can believe him or not, is not the point.

Showing confirmation bias and believing anecdotes from Charlie Sheen is the point I addressed.

You don't think you could have written a reply to me any better than the illogical off-point reply from Payback.

Lol.

Laughter is good for the soul.

Harlequinn, it's The Graham Norton Show, and a silly story Charlie Sheen told. I was surprised that Charlie Sheen is even being booked, because is he even relevant anymore? Then he tells this story. Perhaps to be more relevant.

No one said, "See, Trump is awful, and Charlie Sheen thinks so, it must be true!"

Why be negative and mean? Sinking to a new low...come on, really?
Why haven't you posted more than one video? Honestly curious, not being spiteful, but you must have your reasons.

Yes, it is good for the soul. I'm glad you believe that.

Actually, the first two comments were, paraphrasing here but, "Trump is horrible" and "Charlie Sheen is the voice of reason (and that's whack)".

Your interpretation is that I'm negative and mean. Pointing out truths or untruths, whilst often uncomfortable for many, is not negative or mean. It's not a new, an old, or any low at all. It is a neutral observation.

I've not posted more than one video because I don't see the need to. I only posted the first one to explore the mechanism involved in posting. I've got plenty of material posted by others to look at and comment on, and not nearly enough time in the day to do everything I'd like to do.

I'll tell you what I see as negative and mean. The constant degradation of other human beings because one doesn't agree with their politics. And that includes both Trump and Hillary.

My interpretation was wrong, and your right about pointing out truths or untruths. It is something I will have to remind myself. I apologize for not understanding, and thank you for your response.

I asked about your posting because I was interested in, well, lack of a better way to say it, tickles your fancy. I've learned some interesting new things from your comments, even looking up a word or two, so I imagine your posts would be the same.

I agree with your last paragraph as well. Discussion is positive, something I enjoy. I like to see and understand a persons point of view, it's how I learn so much. I think I can't quite read the tone of some comments, and it is something I am working on, to ask more questions than jump to conclusions. I couldn't agree with your last sentance more.

In my mind I imagine you to be a writer, journalist, or maybe even a college professor. It is silly, I know, but I like how you turn a phrase. I also know I need to ask more questions to gain understanding, instead of doing it all wrong by assuming. Thanks for answering me Harlequinn, and I hope to run into you again on a comment thread soon! Have a great rest of the day.:)