My bullshit detector is going off I'm getting subtle hints of *lies *controversy .

Adding video to channels (Controversy, Lies) - requested by NordlichReiter.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinosaur#Soft_tissue_and_DNA

One of the best examples of soft-tissue impressions in a fossil dinosaur was discovered in Petraroia, Italy. The discovery was reported in 1998, and described the specimen of a small, very young coelurosaur, Scipionyx samniticus. The fossil includes portions of the intestines, colon, liver, muscles, and windpipe of this immature dinosaur.[45]

In the March 2005 issue of Science, the paleontologist Mary Higby Schweitzer and her team announced the discovery of flexible material resembling actual soft tissue inside a 68-million-year-old Tyrannosaurus rex leg bone from the Hell Creek Formation in Montana. After recovery, the tissue was rehydrated by the science team.[46]

When the fossilized bone was treated over several weeks to remove mineral content from the fossilized bone-marrow cavity (a process called demineralization), Schweitzer found evidence of intact structures such as blood vessels, bone matrix, and connective tissue (bone fibers). Scrutiny under the microscope further revealed that the putative dinosaur soft tissue had retained fine structures (microstructures) even at the cellular level. The exact nature and composition of this material, and the implications of Schweitzer's discovery, are not yet clear; study and interpretation of the material is ongoing.[46]

Newer research, published in PloS One (30 July 2008), has challenged the claims that the material found is the soft tissue of Tyrannosaurus. Thomas Kaye of the University of Washington and his co-authors contend that what was really inside the tyrannosaur bone was slimy biofilm created by bacteria that coated the voids once occupied by blood vessels and cells.[89] The researchers found that what previously had been identified as remnants of blood cells, because of the presence of iron, were actually framboids, microscopic mineral spheres bearing iron. They found similar spheres in a variety of other fossils from various periods, including an ammonite. In the ammonite they found the spheres in a place where the iron they contain could not have had any relationship to the presence of blood.[90]

The successful extraction of ancient DNA from dinosaur fossils has been reported on two separate occasions, but, upon further inspection and peer review, neither of these reports could be confirmed.[91] However, a functional visual peptide of a theoretical dinosaur has been inferred using analytical phylogenetic reconstruction methods on gene sequences of related modern species such as reptiles and birds.[92] In addition, several proteins, including hemoglobin,[93] have putatively been detected in dinosaur fossils.[94]

http://videosift.com/video/Potholer54-debunks-more-creationist-junk

I cannot trust anyone giving me a science lecture that looks like Kenny Powers.

The problem with stupid people is that they will always be stupid.

You see, in a scientific environment you are always willing to revisit what you currently understand when you find new evidence.

For example, as I've seen in the recent "mummy dinosaur" specials on National Geographic Channel, these "mummies" with unusual characteristics are changing the way we think about fossils, fossilization, preservation ect. The scientific mind sees this evidence and reconsiders the mechanics of how dinosaurs were preserved and edits the possibility of what can be found...

The stupid mind sees an unusual fossil and immediately jumps to raptor-riding jesus. That's a huge jump fucktard.

So the millions of other fossilized bones hold no merit now because of 1 finding? I find that hard to believe.

That sounds like whining to me!>> ^rottenseed:

So the millions of other fossilized bones hold no merit now because of 1 finding? I find that hard to believe.

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Potholer54-debunks-more-creationist-junk

Invocations (dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Potholer54-debunks-more-creationist-junk) cannot be called by CrushBug because CrushBug is not privileged - sorry.

it's not really a dupe, more of a homage

*turns into the camera*
This is bullshit.

Also, *notdupe. One is short the other is long and the point of the two videos is different.

So can we clone a dinosaur yet???

Upvote for some of the comments up there ^

Hahahaha, those silly christians!

I will swear off science if that means i get to rude a TRex!