i really do not understand you bob.
i get that you are republican,and lean towards the philosophy of the tea party.

i have absolutely no issue with that,but didn't you admonish my post which was promoting the "justice democrats" as not being a grass roots anti-corporate establishment democrats,but rather a tool for outlets like the young turks? whose FIRST order to address.the FIRST thing they are going after is:money in politics.which is exactly what kyle is talking about.

kyle is also talking about giving the boot to not only all the corporate donors,but the very politicians that have LOST,consistently,because they are more interested in dialing for donors than doing their job.pelosi did not retain her position due to her political acumen and ability to pass progressive legislature,but because that woman is a money funding machine.

kyle even mentions the justice democrats!!!!
as a viable option to combat the corruption in the democratic party due to the corrosive influence of corporate money in politics.

you literally just posted a video by secular talk,which is a founding member of justice democrats!

so which one is it bob?

do you respect and admire a small group of democrats who are part of independent media and are creating a group to combat the corporate,establishment democrats? a group who is already
growing in size,and have already got some politicians on the ballot?

or are you sticking to your position you took on my justice democrat video,which was dismissive and critical?

please help me understand bob,because as of right now you are playing two positions that are philosophically inconsistent.

*promote bob's support of the democrats new caucus "the justice democrats",which i am fairy sure is the seventh sign of the apocalypse.

Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Wednesday, May 10th, 2017 3:55pm PDT - promote requested by enoch.

*related=https://videosift.com/video/there-is-a-new-party-in-town-called-the-justice-democrats

there is a new party in town called the justice democrats has been added as a related post - related requested by enoch.

The "justice democrats" is Unconstitutional in most of its platform. Hence its just a nut job dream. The TEA party desire to follow the Constitution. This in itself would limit government size and hence its corruption.

All corporate money should be taken out of politics. - Or at least cap corporate giving to a small amount say $2500. Some amount equal to what the average person/family could give.

Or better yet I would rather, since government control media via FCC Have media give equal FREE time to each candidate.

Moving this video to bobknight33's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

Wow...just wow.
You know those are liberal ideals, right?
Corporate personhood is a baby of the right, and was supported by the tea party.
You, sir, are really a progressive liberal. Congratulations!

@bobknight33
thanks for replying mate.
it is interesting that when you remove labels,the majority of people tend to overlap politically.

even YOU are conceding that there are some liberal/progressive policies that are simply common sense.

which is what @newtboy is pointing out,and was my main goal in getting you to clarify.

and you did.

partisanship serves only those who wish to dominate and control.it never serves the people.