Damn, this is cool. Wish I had found it. *promote

Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Wednesday, September 15th, 2010 8:03pm PDT - promote requested by kronosposeidon.

Small enough for @ant!

>> ^Issykitty:

Small enough for @<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/ant" title="member since March 2nd, 2006" class="profilelink"><strong style="color: rgb(0, 136, 0);">ant!

Awesome animation, but why use the CellScope? The Macro function on any digital camera would function equally well or better for this purpose.

That was clever.

This is a small part of an article about the CellScope:

"through to the maximum 50x magnification, which can show individual white and red blood cells"

I dunno about your digital cameras but none of mine do this. I know this magnification isn't that but a device made with that level of usage probably comes with some advantages.
>> ^cybrbeast:

Awesome animation, but why use the CellScope? The Macro function on any digital camera would function equally well or better for this purpose.

>> ^yellowc:

This is a small part of an article about the CellScope:
"through to the maximum 50x magnification, which can show individual white and red blood cells"
I dunno about your digital cameras but none of mine do this. I know this magnification isn't that but a device made with that level of usage probably comes with some advantages.
>> ^cybrbeast:
Awesome animation, but why use the CellScope? The Macro function on any digital camera would function equally well or better for this purpose.



That's exactly it, this video doesn't use anything close to those magnifications, so I don't see the point of using the CellScope. If you've seen any good macro photos you can see that their quality is much better than the stop motion frames used in this video.