To reduce truancy by elimination, I guess.

I'm not a gun nut and don't think schools need rifles on hand... but these people have no idea what they are talking about:

"High Caliber"? Nope, it's only .223

Used by "US special ops"? No, why would they limit themselves to semi-auto?

Designed for "targeted shooting"? What other kind of shooting do you do with a rifle?

I'm glad that they went through 40 hours of training, now as long as they have followup training and regular practice I've got no problem with this. But something tells me that isn't what's going to happen. The guns will probably sit there, unused for years, until something DOES happen, and they'll have forgotten their training or haven't practiced in months and someone will do something stupid or just get more people killed.

The pundits were talking about arming teachers and that's fucking nuts. hire and arm trained professionals which is fine.

Once again, gotta dispel the strawman that likes to get perpetuated by the right wing loonies. No one wants to take away your guns. We just want some increased safety and training for those who do buy guns. Prove you can use it safely and can use it competently and can keep it secure and most people will not have a problem with this.

She said "hi powered"-Point is, it's an AR-15 like the fucking bushmaster(Sandy Hook), cept it's a Colt (better gun). what's yer point? More mysterious but not is the lemur-like up-voting of your pedantic, oblivious comment...

It's really quite annoying when you use the term "right wing loonies" or some other such rhetoric-to-incite whenever you pop spit all over similar posts, no-doubt just as annoying are advocates of sanity and less bullshit. Very sophomoric, and fucking irritating and rude....Simpleton?! How about taking a a bath in the cold waters of of the experiential gravity well?

You really just don't have any self awareness do you?

you complain about my use of slang and rhetoric. Yet in the very next series of sentences, you launch into your own tirade of derisive rhetoric and insults.

Here, let me attempt to clarify the irony with a much more simple example.

"This motherfucker is calling me names!"

If you're going to cry foul about mud-slinging, it helps if you're not slinging your own mud. Just a suggestion though.

Now...do you have any arguments that actually have to do with topic at hand, or are you just going to whine again?

Ya, I didn't comment on the phrase "high-powered" because that's true enough. However, I did mention the newsreader that introduced the reporter that said "high caliber".

So I guess that makes your comment "oblivious" huh? Ya, think so. And "pedantic" isn't really a fit here either because the things I pointed out were pretty obvious false statements in a purported news segment. I don't think news should ever modify the truth, even slightly to put a new swing on the story. And if they really didn't know... It's called fact checking, and it's their job.

It's just as easy to cloak insults in devisive speech, your forte VooDooV-Your stance is clear, and yes, I launch into whatever the fuck I please (insults inferred) ,in the face of bullshit. Simpleton? Tell your mommy, have a dissenting opinion banned because your feelings were hurt??

Pussified.

It is an insult and a personal affront to me (the same to me as being called a cunt, prick, asshole,etc) to be accused of having no self-awareness. DO YOU??!! Do you even know what the fuck self-awareness is??

Your opinion noted, go fuck yourself.
How about for the cheap seats, you tell this retarded redneck what the goddamn "topic at hand" is.

Look man. I ain't no hater, and I recognize the dynamics of this issue and the passion of both camps. The infamous history I enjoy as a member here is fluid and tenuous and should this escalate into yet another, torch and pitchfork party for my ass, well....Go for it. Make it your fucking new project and more power to ya. Pick a violation of policy and run with it like a champ-

I think one of your problems is that you just communicate really poorly.

Instead of a cogent argument, we just get a string of ad-hominems, non-sequiturs and other random crap.

Maybe if you took the time to review your posts before hitting submit, you might be able to edit them to make your point more clearly.

Personally, I doubt it, but then I just think you're a fucking idiot.

Yeah chaosengine I'd have to revisit a few posts to make any similar assessment as to your character. Admittedly, i do have a bit of trouble communicating without lapsing into prose.... learn to read between lines or simply get the gist and it won't upset you so much. What you think is yours to think and I resemble that remark. Thank You.

How interesting, it's not ching's responsibility to communicate clearly, it's OUR responsibility to understand HIM correctly.

Must be nice to be able to shift the burden like that.

Well, they don't call it Fontucky for nothing.

That's right, smugly. It's also your responsibility to remove your own head from your own ass. I may have confounded you and others with the motivation for this post but I am not responsible for the effortless contortions it took for you to arrive nose-to -nose with your own sigmoid.

I'm sorry, you might be a really great guy in person, but your posts sound like you're really saying nothing but school-yard, redneck insults that have been not-so-cleverly disguised as intelligent by frequent visits to thesaurus.com

You guys are getting trolled.

Yeehaw!! We don't need us no more faggy books er God hatin' science teachers, let's use our budget to git us some guns.

⚨⚨⚨..one of the little last word Wallys', true to form.

*dead

This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by chicchorea.