Footage of bombs and explosions, set to the song "Bombs" by Faithless. This is not at all intended to be a war glorification video. NSFW for a few graphic and disturbing images of war victims. NOT the same video as this one: http://www.videosift.com/video/Faithless-Bombs , though it's also definitely worth viewing.
honkeytonk73says...

A vote for the elite 'establishment' is a vote for continuation of this madness. Doesn't matter what party it is. Wake up world. The world is under threat from the war machine.

kronosposeidonsays...

Anyone who thinks this is a snuff video needs to read this discussion first: http://www.videosift.com/video/Canadian-Police-Taser-Man-To-Death

And anyone who discards something like this without at least blogging it first has bad fucking manners. Yeah, I'm talking about you, therealblankman. Should VideoSift just post videos about kitties and unicorns, or can it occasionally show what's happening in a war zone? Or should we sanitize VideoSift for your protection? Get a clue, blankboy.

MarineGunrocksays...

Awww... the video got revived so your wittle feewings got huwt? Grow the fuck up, therealblankman. Wtf is your problem? How does this fit the definition of snuff?
Thank ninjas for immunity to * banning from pissy sifters.

K0MMIEsays...

BAN!? You know I can hold a grudge better than anyone but even I wouldn't try to pull the ban card out on somebody because the community disagreed with me and saved the video!

loorissays...

this is first time I've seen people going mad with star powers on the sift.

the first discard was totally idiotic (he should've blogged it) but could be forgivable.

but trying to invoke ban after DAG returned it to sifttalk is like calling out loud "I'm stupid, just kill me".

loorissays...

this makes me think +blog invocation should work even with videos which have been discarded.

and that maybe +discard invocation should be seconded, and could be called only after video has already been blogged, or something like that

eric3579says...

When people object to videos like this I always wonder why they dont want this to be seen, as I do. Is it because the reality of war is so vicious and cruel its hard to stomach. I often am upset, angry and left feeling helpless when I see the horrors of war or the unjust way we the citizens our treated by our own government. I say bring on the dead children, show the abuse of the police and there non lethal tazers. Maybe if we see enough of it we will actually get off our fat asses and write a letter, go to a protest, vote. All I know is my government seems to be leading the way when it comes to the killing of people around the globe,and often I feel sad and ashamed that I havent done more to stop it.

8756says...

When I first saw this video, I've read the comment first.

"This is not at all intended to be a war glorification video."

The purpose is clear and that's why I've upvote.

And it's not because we're preserving us by discarding this kind of videos that these hellish wars don't occur. (Sorry for bad english ...)

dystopianfuturetodaysays...

MINK. This is a common internet misconception, but, personal attacks and/or harsh language does not automatically constitute an ad hominem attack. MG's comment is just a good old fashioned upbraiding.

In order to be an ad hom, MG would have had to say 'your argument is logically wrong BECAUSE you are stupid and childish', which would be a logical fallacy.

In summary:
'You are an asshole' = Not an ad hom.
'You are wrong BECAUSE you are an asshole' = ad hom.

Sorry to be such a stickler about it.

calvadossays...

All the argument stuff seems to be said already, so I'll just note that the "terrible" channel is actually the "that's terrible, who gave that a greenlight" channel, conceived for awful movies etc. We /should/ have a channel for things that are genuinely terrible, tho, IMO.

loorissays...

you're right.
I'm not removing it just because I can't be bothered removing all channels and re-adding the other four all by hand

oh, I remember someone said that in this case the correct thing to do should be to just remove them, and let the poster re-add them himself. whatever.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More