O'Reilly seems to be confusing An Officer and a Gentleman with the cops. Adultery is unbecoming to an officer and could be grounds for loss of rank.

And this is coming from Mr Loofah.

What a hypocrite.

*promote

Self promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Friday, September 9th, 2011 7:39pm PDT - promote requested by original submitter Boise_Lib.

What? Wait a minute! Bill O'Reilly's a douche?? Stop the presses.

>> ^nanrod:

What? Wait a minute! Bill O'Reilly's a douche?? Stop the presses.


*stops presses* Not a problem anymore with all these high-tech presses. What now?

>> ^bareboards2:

O'Reilly seems to be confusing An Officer and a Gentleman with the cops. Adultery is unbecoming to an officer and could be grounds for loss of rank.
And this is coming from Mr Loofah.
What a hypocrite.


I disagree. As Cenk points out, he's not the one committing adultery and besides, it's no one else's business except for the people directly involved. It's not like two people who are in love, one of them in a marriage that's down the tubes, will wait until a costly divorce has been finalised. I'm not saying this is the case here, but we don't know and shouldn't judge someone else's private business

I agree that it is a private matter and nobody's business.

However, when you approach public servants and involve them in your quest to "win" in a divorce settlement, then you have lost your right to "this is private."

Bad behavior on O'Reilly's part, and nothing new.


>> ^EvilDeathBee:

>> ^bareboards2:
O'Reilly seems to be confusing An Officer and a Gentleman with the cops. Adultery is unbecoming to an officer and could be grounds for loss of rank.
And this is coming from Mr Loofah.
What a hypocrite.

I disagree. As Cenk points out, he's not the one committing adultery and besides, it's no one else's business except for the people directly involved. It's not like two people who are in love, one of them in a marriage that's down the tubes, will wait until a costly divorce has been finalised. I'm not saying this is the case here, but we don't know and shouldn't judge someone else's private business

This is a very complicated situation... I'm staying out of this yo.

I believe NY state is actually one of those states where adultery is still a crime, is it not?

You know--I'm not sure. Anyone from NY know?

>> ^GeeSussFreeK:

I believe NY state is actually one of those states where adultery is still a crime, is it not?

*law

Adding video to channels (Law) - requested by MrFisk.

>> ^GeeSussFreeK:

I believe NY state is actually one of those states where adultery is still a crime, is it not?


Correct, though it's a law that's hardly ever enforced.

Section 255.17 of NYS penal law:
"A person is guilty of adultery when he engages in sexual intercourse with another person at a time when he has a living spouse, or the other person has a living spouse. Adultery is a class B misdemeanor."

So technically Cenk is absolutely wrong when he repeatedly says no laws were broken.

nobody cares what a msnbc brown mouthpiece says, or what a redneck fox mouthpiece says...

just 2 different parts of the same political correct retard movement.

remove political correctness and this world would be a much better place.