That's neat and all, I guess, don't get me wrong. But what exactly is the point.. wasn't the intention of that scene in Back to the Future 2 meant to be as close as possible to the original?

Well, I guess the point is that it is interesting when you need to re-create something completely and this shows how close (or not close in some cases) they came to it.

It's odd that they reenacted it -- why not just use the footage from the previous movie?

roads roads? where where we're we're going going we we don't don't need need roads roads.

I always just assumed that the footage from the second movie was taken from the first movie. It didn't occur to me that the actress changed, so of course they would have had to re-film it. I guess I'm not that observant (of faces, or of names for that matter). Thanks, that was fun!

More than one actress played the part.

>> ^arvana:
It's odd that they reenacted it -- why not just use the footage from the previous movie?

The actress in the first one is a no-name, whereas in the sequel it was Elizabeth Shoe.

^ Wow. Never had any idea.

Claudia Wells is 10x hotter than Elizabeth Shue. You're right about the more famous part tho...

I understand Claudia wasn't in BTTF 2&3 because she devoted her time to caring for her mother who developed cancer.

Oh what might have been...

Woah! I never noticed they were different. I always thought it was the same clips from the first movie!

Wow.... did not know.

also.. hotter? They look pretty much the same.

I'm looking at a freeze frame at 1:25 and see no way that one could be considered hotter than the other..

Say hello to your mom for me.

The fire wasn't there in the sequel re-shoot, but that's to be expected.

The 'Marty's girlfriend/wife' role was minimal either way.

I'm into the first one more than the second one. Perhaps the biggest shortcoming of these awesome films was that the girlfriend wasn't really that hot.

>> ^ponceleon:
The actress in the first one is a no-name, whereas in the sequel it was Elizabeth Shoe.


She had NO NAME? Oh my god the poor girl.

It's going to be 2015 in just about five years. Where is my hoverboard? Where are my flying cars and my reverse shrinky-dink pizzas? What about that shark hologram and the self drying, self tailoring jacket? And for god sake, my plastic vest that makes chicken noises?!

All that stuff somehow seemed reasonable to me when I was a kid.

>> ^AeroMechanical:
It's going to be 2015 in just about five years. Where is my hoverboard? Where are my flying cars and my reverse shrinky-dink pizzas? What about that shark hologram and the self drying, self tailoring jacket? And for god sake, my plastic vest that makes chicken noises?!
All that stuff somehow seemed reasonable to me when I was a kid.


No need for all this crap! Now you have The Internets, the iPhone, and Twitter!!

I want a Back to the Future 4..

Mirror just in case: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-WQ8FgkAfo ...

*dead

This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by oritteropo.

Awarding ctrlaltbleach with one Power Point for fixing this video's dead embed code.

*dead

This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by papple.

Awarding chingalera with one Power Point for fixing this video's dead embed code.

Back to the Future - Part 1 End vs Part 2 Start Side-by-Side has been added as a related post - related requested by ant on that post.