you are being sarcastic right?
have you checked into mr breitbart?read his columns?
the first inclination that this dude may be a little off is giving maddow credit for egttong Obama elected.
i actually agree with much of what he was saying but some may need to refer to their "jingoism" dictionary to get some of the points he is making.

lol.

lol, Just quoting the original...
Further on, He talks about Destroy, Destroy, Destroy..., I think that must be where the title comes from...

Still..., I'm moving on... *Discard

Discarding this post - discard requested by original submitter Sagemind.

He's completely clueless, isn't he? Everyone knows Cheney is the worst human being to ever walk the face of the Earth, not Bush.

*Promote this one back one more time and see if it gets some discussion going...

*Promote this one back one more time and see if it gets some discussion going...
Ha HA, Oop's - first time ever double posted....

Post cannot be self promoted by original submitter Sagemind because Sagemind does not have enough Power Points. (You can always purchase more Power Points.)

Moving this video to Sagemind's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

What the heck... Took my 2 points but didn't promote the vid - I feel robbed!

i got ya sage.
*promote!

Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued - promote requested by enoch.

Meh. He is free market thinker AKA the ends justify the means. I don't think his points have too much truth to them. Example: He claims that Maddow oversold Obama intentionally. And that she, in some backwards logic helped to initiate the forming of these groups because Obama is starting to dissapoint. I would wager everything I own that over 90% of the tea baggers voted for someone other than obama. They were not effected in anyway by Maddow, because their republicans! they demonize msnbc, they would never allow themselves to take advice from a socialist dyke. They prefer their news from a Beck and the lot. The basis of his whole argumet to me, is not true. So I can't put any weight into him, he's a just another seething, frothing, republican stooge.


So In researching this Andrew guy I found quite a bit of dirt that shows him doing exactly what he is condemming Maddow for doing, which is spreading misinformation and propaganda. Hypocracy = total loss of credibility.
Here's one blog, there are plenty others:
http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2010/02/24/a-conscious-effort-to-deceive-is-unacceptable/

sounds like he has self assurance and little else. i know maddow is bad, but that doesn't make you good... INDEED.

I mean the last thing we need is another jackass to shake things up split the vote and let some asshole like bush defeat gore. But no, the tea party is a new kind of jackass, one we can believe in. (last part was sarcastic)

this guy actually says that maddow and other goofy liberals created the tea party movement. Am i the only 1 that finds that sad and inauspicious?

can someone put a *lies on this one?

Invocations (lies) cannot be called by Drachen_Jager because Drachen_Jager is not privileged - sorry.

*meh. While some of his points have validity, that's pretty much obscured by the usual blowhard rhetoric, and no Maddows were killed or injured in the making of this film.

actually i have a video where ron paul touches on progressives. "the progressives today, taht argue for less constitiution and less warmongering, don't have a place to go"

I suppose if he bashes maddow into nonexistence that is actually a step towards consensus against washington. Allow me to take away the comment just above.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YH-UjDrYRqg&feature=youtu.be

Moving this video to Sagemind's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

*discard

Discarding this post - discard requested by original submitter Sagemind.