if this isnt faked im seriously impressed, the logistics of pulling that off seems ridiculous

as a cover its pretty solid, but from an 11 year old its pretty fantastic. upvote

I don't really understand why someone texting bothers anyone ? Cinemas i goto you cant even see people's laps anyhow, and with the floor slanted slightly you're looking over their heads anyhow and straight to the screen. Is there some sort of glare issue ? Are people using their screens as flood lights or something ? Maybe that'd be annoying i guess.

recording the movie, kicking the backs of seats infront, talking, and throwing food about fair enough that sucks alot, but texting ?! Couldnt care less personally. (I dont do it though, I turn my phone off cos i wouldnt pay for the movie if i didnt wanna watch it).

you'd think the "staff" written on his shirt might be a give away...

>> ^Ryjkyj:

>> ^sirex:
"ever notice feminists are always people you wouldnt wanna f anyway?" - george carlin.

God I fucking hate it when people misquote Carlin.


o_O That comment was 4 years ago. Anyhow I looked this up, and it's "Have you noticed that most of the women who are against abortion are women you wouldn't want to fuck in the first place, man" So yes, you are arguably right. This may have been was mixed up with "feminists want to control your language".

On the other hand, this was from his shows like in 1997 or so. Memory isn't infallible.

This (long) lecture about sugar is pretty useful to explain why HFCS is so bad.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnniua6-oM

>> ^alien_concept:

>> ^Djevel:
I lost it at the prison population...all too true.

Why's that? I didn't get that bit


My guess would be the premise that offenders in jails "find christ". Apparently christ is serving a shit load of time in there. Who knew ?

>> ^NicoleBee:

I think they must have precogs working for that places fire department..


You know that video has time codes on it, right ?

"in countries such as Canada, Asia, South Africa, Europe and the UK"

nice.

>> ^Sagemind:

I just don't trust the US government. And I don't understand why they destroyed all the real evidence (AKA the body).

Because he's not a trophy, as much as the average meat head dip-shit would like to believe. Gloating over his corpse is below the level that the US thinks of itsself, and rightly so. Doing so would be no better than those they fight.

I'm really not a lover of the US generally (oh how their crap gets into every pore of our lives), but i appauld them for taking the higher moral ground on this. Aside from all else, why pour petrol on the fire ? People can not believe it if they want and that's fine, as no unneeded anger leading to even more deaths gets caused that way at least.

Also, it would be an incredible bluff to make as it's so easily disproved. The fact that there's been no instant refusal should speak volumes.

>> ^Retroboy:

Oh he stuck the landing all right.
After such a notable feat of testosterone-laced he-manliness, his masculine impact was so super great it spawned a minor but significant warp in time that caused the videocamera to lurch and gave the appearance that his leg had slipped.


sarcasm detector is broken - since when was gynastics manly ?

I'm guessing she doesn't smoke. ... Does that count as dying in a house fire ?

*promote

cos by god dammit, it deserves it.

seriously impressed with this guys voice. really nice.

dosent seem like an odd question. I'd imagine any electronic comunication with a person like him is highly restricted.