Bond films fucking blow. ALL OF THEM.

*promote - way more interesting than i thought it'd be. in one way, they're fucking annoying, but in another i kinda appreciate that they're just exploiting this niche to get by. there's far worse things out there to do.

You guys are not punk-worthy! This album is so PUNK that it doesn't even bother to contain any punk.

the Cave is glorious, Little Lion Man is pretty good and the rest of the album (including this track) is just ok for me. Upvoted because it sits on the same album as one of my favourite songs.

Ronin had excellent car chases. Drive was a much better film.

his retraction:
http://www.ketv.com/news/national/N-C-pastor-retracts-sermon-remarks-about-punching-gay-kids/-/9674576/12529326/-/bs2q95/-/index.html

"I did not say anything to intentionally offend anyone in the LGBT community."

the 'Rubber Room' (or similar) is addressed in the documentary 'Waiting for Superman' as well.

make this happen.

Florida Student Interviewed About Trayvon Martin Case Before Meltdown In Class

hurray!

best channel on youtube.

>> ^Kofi:

>> ^sepatown:
. how does the layman watching the video know if 37% is a lot or not much? is 27% for awareness programs good or bad? who knows?.

Was it not dumbed down enough for you?
Did you not hear what he said at the end about where to find information about what is good and bad for a charity percentage wise?
More info, less opinion please.


i actually mentioned that website in my post. and they're ranked 3 stars out of 4.

i don't think he makes good points at all. without comparing those pie-charts to the pie-charts of other aid organizations, those percentage splits are meaningless. how does the layman watching the video know if 37% is a lot or not much? is 27% for awareness programs good or bad? who knows? how much of that 27% is essential for boosting their income?

also his problem with the Legacy Scholarship Fun is strange as well, he recognizes that it's a good program but has a problem with $1.1million being spent on 'only' 700-800 kids. once again, without context how do we know if that is bad? 1.1million by 800 kids is like $1400 bucks per kid, per year. that doesn't jump out at me as some insanely unjustifiable figure UNLESS YOU PROVIDE ME WITH CONTEXT which he fails to do, which is interesting because he spends some time attacking the fund for that exact thing.

the only thing more annoying than the people jumping to support this KONY thing by clicking 'like' and then feeling good about themselves are the people jumping just as quickly to the contrarian position and then demonizing this charity because they wanna be in that group that thinks that they're somehow smarter than everyone else because they've read on Reddit or a blog somewhere that Invisible Children's Accountability & Transparency only scored 2/4 on Charity Navigator and therefore must be a scam.

this is really not funny.