Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Check your email for a verification code and enter it below.Don't close this box or you must fill out this form again.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Jack Nicholson Interrupts Jennifer Lawrence Interview
He's a shark-like lothario with creeper tendencies. I like him!
The Art of Seduction with Christoph Waltz
Anything Christoph Waltz = upvote.
Review - Far Cry 3. Best reviewer since Zero Punctuation
Zoltan Chivay, the early years.
Jimmy Kimmel's You Tube Challenge - Bad Valentine Gifts
Good job bracing that closing door with the snake's small head you jabroni!
On a good note I like when these clips cut off Jimmy Kimmel mid sentence.
Weird little rain frog
SAND COAT - SQUEEK - ROLL DODGE- BODYSLAM!
hey it's a pokemon! wonder what it's special power is?
Is Your Red The Same As My Red?
He kinda just reminds me of a sleight of hand magician..... without.. all.. the magic.
*I arise from the floor off-camera*
But his method of speaking also increases his audience capacity by a large factor. It's a common method in broadcast journalism to imagine a specific audience member and tailor your speaking towards her. Perhaps he's imagining an intelligent child or an elder who's hard of hearing.
Put Sriracha on EVERYTHING
Is this one o' them movin' inste-gram pit'chers? /oldcoot
Askin' fer a foight (funny subtitles)
Ehhm.....noice?
Zillions of spiders - Just hanging above!
Fuck that! I'm out.
I thought you didn't give pretty girls tickets?
To be clear, in the original video the cop's lines from: "Pardon me" up to "sign here" are fabricated. Replacing the original soundtrack and dialogue of the lady relaying her address to the cop as he copies it down and spins the clipboard around for her to sign.
I'm an experienced sound editor. If there's one thing I understand in this world, it's audio and how to hide an edit. At its core this video fails to do that on several levels and all I hope to accomplish here is to educate people who want to learn how to spot a fake in the future.
I am 100% certain this is a fake, rendering it zero true value to the sift.
Don't you find it at all suspicious that in the original video the lady is audible whenever she speaks except for when she supposedly asks the cop the implied question? Why wouldn't she be heard then? It's because when he asks for her present address (actual dialogue) her actual dialogue (stating her address while he writes it down) is removed and the cop's zinger is shoe-horned in.
Notice the awkwardness in the jump in time between the the end of the zinger "sign here" and "This is not an admission of guilt"(actual dialogue). The difference in the fidelity of the audio (the fake dub vs the actual dialogue) is apparent. Besides that, it's just an unnatural rhythm of speaking forgetting that the dubbed voice is way off in terms of a match for the cop when listened to back to back at such a close proximity. The dubbers didn't have a large window of time to work within giving the dialogue a rushed quality which helps to expose it as a fake.
Also note the cop's body language while he is speaking to her throughout the original video. He frequently looks at her making eye contact when addressing her. During the false exchange his body language in no way reflects the bewilderment that is expressed when he repeats her assumed hushed dialogue.
On top of all that the dubbers failed to add foley of the sound of him handling his clipboard, a sound close enough to the cop to be picked up or cause interference with the cop's mic. There is just silence instead since they removed all sound during the exchange added a background ambiance loop (plenty of b-roll to draw from) and then dubbed in the lines which has fooled 110 (as of this post) into voting it into the #1 spot.
These are the exact kinds of tricks that are used in "reality" tv to take raw footage of people and construct characters in post utilizing the most sensational dialogue available and place a musical backing track to let you know how you are supposed to be feeling about a certain person or situation.
TL:DR See funny thing, upvote and move on.
While it might be dubbed for sound quality for the TV show, I saw nothing in the original vid that made me think they changed any of the dialogue. Seems unlikely she said, "I like peanut butter sandwiches." Followed by the cop saying, "You didn't think we gave pretty girls tickets?" The cop clearly repeats/paraphrases what she is saying to him, or at least it's a fair assumption.
I thought you didn't give pretty girls tickets?
This is completely fake. Both the lady's setup AND the cop's zinger (starting with "Pardon me") is someone else's voice poorly dubbed in. You can hear it plain as day in the vid nomino posted above. It's easier to be fooled by this video here since you don't get as much of the context to familiarize yourself with the cop's actual voice. What you all are upvoting is a simple traffic stop with two bad dubbing jobs. Listen for yourselves and don't be fooled!
World's highest resolution video surveillance platform
I can confidently say that this technology is being abused beyond belief.
The 'Oh Crap!' squirrel
That rodent is a hero.
Totally Working LEGO Porsche 911 (997) Turbo Cabriolet PDK
I wacked it so hard to this vid.
The Most Amazing Footage Of The Moon In Decades
It looks like vertical cameraphone syndrome strikes agai-- OH. My attempt at seemingly unique and timely internet cleverness hath been foiled. Plan B! Switching into observational humor mode. That just happened.