LOVE the self-satisfied lean-back-and-smile he gives at the end.

If you just want to see him shoot it : skip to 1:55.

If you want to see him shoot it into a watermelon : skip to 2:25.

If you want to see something worthwhile : skip it.

Well here's a question for you Mr. White-Haired-CNN-Man, if you're so smart, why would you wear a shirt that moirés on national television?

Wait, wait, wait.

This guy is discharged. Then, after he's out of the armed forces, he does something or other to piss off the military. So they waste god knows how much government money to hold a trial to retroactively change what they call the conditions of his discharge?

You're fucking with me, right?>> ^d3n4l1:

Here is a little education about the borderless idiot running the show:
"Kokesh enlisted in the United States Marine Corps in 1999, while still in high school in New Mexico.[3] In 2004, he served in Fallujah.[4] Working a checkpoint was a responsibility while in Iraq.[5] He brought home a pistol from Iraq in 2004,[3] violating military rules, and preventing him from returning on a second Iraq tour.[5] Kokesh "had risen to the rank of sergeant after three-and-a-half years in the Reserves" and "was demoted to corporal and soon thereafter discharged honorably with a re-enlistment code that basically said, 'you can't re-enlist.'"[5] Having experienced combat in Fallujah, Kokesh received the Combat Action Ribbon and the Navy Commendation Medal after his honorable discharge from active duty.[6]
...
After his discharge, and during a March 19, 2007, protest he attended, Kokesh was in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR);[5] a superior officer identified him in a photo caption in the Washington Post.[7] On "March 29, a Marine major sent him an e-mail to tell him he was being investigated for misconduct by appearing at a political event in uniform. Kokesh responded, telling the major what he thought" and used an expletive in his reply, resulting in an additional misconduct charge.[5] The charges were "brought under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which applies only to service members", confusing some veterans and lawyers.[5]
[edit] Hearing
In May 2007, a hearing was convened to consider changing Kokesh's military discharge from "honorable" to "other than honorable" on two points: "Disrespect toward a Superior Commissioned Officer", and violating "Wearing of the uniform" regulation.[8][9] The panel recommended Kokesh be given a "general discharge under honorable conditions",[10] a discharge status below "honorable", and above "other than honorable".[11] Kokesh appealed the decision, and was denied."
Would the soldiers at Valley Forge appreciate your "victims" cries of "Foul" [language]?

I wonder how many hours of footage this guy has of exgirlfriends that he never proposed to...

Copied from an old act? Link or it didn't happen.>> ^DerHasisttot:

I wonder if it's copied from an old act.

You can read all about this and other socially conscious internet behavior in Genji's upcoming book How to Act Appropriately: a handbook written by a jello shot between fake breasts.>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:

Tho it's not funny because we already know that she is single and really fuckin' sad because of it.
There's a time and a place and that place shouldn't be videosift.
Upload this video to 4chan and be a dick there.
>> ^GeeSussFreeK:
>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:
Didn't we just have this whole "trolling needs to be toned down" discussion yesterday?
How is mocking an enormous social injustice beneficial to anyone?
>> ^rottenseed:
so...she's single now?


...too soon?


Some people deal with "shit" by laughter, I know I do.

This is one of the best how-to videos I've ever seen.

Straightforward, fast paced, not condescending. No filler, just facts. This is everything HowCast, wikiHow, eHow, etc. should be.

You had me at "people are idiots".

I freakin' hate SEAL Team Six.

No wait, that's Pod Six.

My mistake.

It's called the iTunes store, and I think I just heard something about a software store like it...>> ^chilaxe:

A record store? What's that?

As a 25 year old, I'm playing poker in an AC casino. A 60ish man sitting to my left plays a big hand well and takes down a good sized pot, getting an all in call from the 2 seat.

He remarks to me, "God, that's better than sex."
I shoot him a quizzical look.
He expounds, "Well, maybe not at your age, but at mine."

I doubted that then, and Dan Savage helps affirm the hope that my libido will endure even when I'm getting half priced movie tickets.

I have so many issues with this video, I don't think I'll be able to recall all of them to write down. I'll preface all of this by saying that I'm an avid poker player and during my senior year of college ('04-'05) & the year after I graduated, online poker was my sole source of income. I now make trips to AC from NYC when my hectic work/social schedule allows.

1 - You think US casinos didn't want in on online gambling from jump street? Wrong. This is a HUGE industry. Casinos aren't the RIAA; they're willing to adapt to new sources of revenue & have wanted in since online gambling started started gaining traction in the US. I don't know what happened recently with Caesar's, but I assure you that casinos have been lobbying for a long time to get a piece of the action. There have been stories for at least the last 7 years about US casinos wanting to operate online gambling sites.

2 - I'm pretty sure that online gambling is not actually illegal. What's illegal is running an online gambling site. Very important distinction. What's also illegal is US financial institutions transferring money to gambling sites. None of this has any bearing on the players. If you can manage to get money to a site, you haven't broken any laws, the bank or credit card company has. This too is a very important distinction from "online gambling is illegal." Online gambling isn't illegal. Operating an online gambling site in the US is illegal. A bank giving money to an offshore site is illegal (this law was only passed ~4 years ago). But gambling online is not illegal.

3 - Are TYT really arguing that gambling should be legal everywhere and that antigambling legislature is a purely moral issue? This is sort of ridiculous. It's just good sense. I believe poker rooms should be legalized nationwide, but I don't agree that all gambling should be. Providing every member of the population the opportunity to play the slots after a hard day of work is a very, very bad idea. Not because the bible says it's wrong, but just from an economic standpoint. They seem to be arguing that the gov't disallowing online gambling is depriving people of their rights, as if gambling isn't illegal almost everywhere in the US. Very weak & (IMO) misguided argument here.

4 - One thing they're right about, though they didn't get into it at all, is that this is going to be VERY bad for some people. Some folks who make their living doing this will have anywhere from a few thousand to hundreds of thousands of dollars tied up on these sites. I guarantee that freezing their accounts has ruined a number of people's lives. I would have liked some more on this topic. (Though I understand I'm probably not in the majority here)

5 - Can you get the fucking aspect ratio right on Cenk's camera? Is it really so hard to center-cut a 16:9 shot? Or is Cenk just trying to make himself look skinny? Speaking of which, why isn't this whole spot 16:9? It's 2011. How long are SD aspect ratios going to be around?

That's all I remember, and I don't want to rewatch this video and get worked up all over again. Bad reporting IMO. I feel like I say that about TYT very often.

My first thought too, so I made it : linky.

I think it works surprisingly well.>> ^Truckchase:

Shouldn't there be a Dylan song mixed in with this?

"And of course, this incident comes on top of..."

Just couldn't help yourself, could you?