@Shepppard

Firstly, ya got me. I totally didn't click your links.


Secondly, I present a rebuttal:

Whether the Hercules is military owned or not was not my suggestion. And whether a peaceful civilization or not, a form of organized defense is necessary should a time come it is required.

However, the US has misused, nay, abused their power for centuries and I was only poking fun at people who jump the gun to libel the current government. So distinguishing between who might own the vehicle is not really relevant to my attempt at humor.
>> ^Shepppard:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/freernuts" title="member since April 25th, 2009" class="profilelink">freernuts
"The Lockheed C-130 Hercules is a four-engine turboprop military transport aircraft"
"The Lockheed AC-130 gunship is a heavily-armed ground-attack aircraft"
Next time try actually clicking the links I posted, and reading the first line

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:

The smoke looks like the Grim Reaper.


Totally! And "Angel" pattern? More like Angel of Death. [insert anti-war, anti-Republican, hooray anarchy rant]

>> ^Shepppard:

For the record: There's a difference between a C-130, and an AC-130.
A C-130 "Hercules" is just a regular troop/supply transport, whereas an AC-130 "Spooky" is flying gunship.
There doesn't seem to be any visible guns, so I'm going to wager a guess that this is just a C-130


It's a cargo ship...

Without question, that is an image of a semi-erect, circumsized penis of an adult, human male.>> ^Retroboy:

And no, Spiderman's most embarassing moment is NOT being captured in a thumbnail in a pose that makes him look like a cross between a pepperoni and a penis.

Also, the driver didn't seem to care that he struck a child. Had he done the right thing, he would have ran out and made sure he was alright, despite being pelted by rocks. And what does that teach? Totally what this guy already said:
>> ^raverman:

I was going to say this video summed up the cycle of hate in under 1 minute. From an angry child to wanting to kill israelis for the rest of his life.
Then i read the comments ... I'm amazed you all think it's ok to run a child over for throwing rocks. kids do dumb stuff. Any child? your child? your brother? your sister? Or just palestinian children.
Learned consequences? More likely he learned to feel no compassion. In 5 years when he launches a rocket into an Isreali school he'll feel vengeance and justification...
He'll have learned from personal experience: Children are valid targets for violence.

Ok, three thoughts:

1) This isn't a girl becoming Jared Leto. This is actually what Jared Leto is and what it has to go through every morning. Like, this isn't a spoof or a gag. This is stolen footage of what goes on in the Leto residence in the wee hours of the morn... ...creepy.

2) Am I the only one that thinks it's odd that the one girl who looks a lot like Jared Leto is also incredibly talented at making herself look a lot like Jared Leto? I mean, we can spin around jokes about Leto's lack of masculinity, but what are the odds here?

It would have been just as sad but true interesting if someone Photoshop'd a picture of this girl into Leto. Also, it wasn't a girl changing to say...Julia Roberts; it was a girl changing to the guy that everyone emasculates...AND she's an incredible make-up artist.

Seriously, this video could have been her doing another girl's make-up. Or hell, even another dude's. But it's all one person! Which only further supports #1

3) As a male, I have no idea what supposed "make-up" is so I have no clue how this performed. Are all females born with this ability, or is she just freakishly talented? If the latter, how the hell did she become this good? Is she a Hollywood artist? What does that even mean?! Are their schools for this? Can you fail this school? Is this the result of a Hollywood make-up art school drop-out? Otherwise, how the hell is the one girl that looks like Jared Leto ALSO this freakishly good at making herself, with just make-up, look like Jared Leto?!

Seriously, how does one achieve this?

>> ^Enzoblue:

This is what artists are for. I can't do this shit, so artists need to step up like this guy did. I wouldn't even know where to start and this guy's got it done already. Bravo.

This is kind of like a a real-world Newton's Cradle.

I totally agree, but it's much better than responding with some garbled spin that didn't address anything. Akin to this response...


>> ^NetRunner:

>> ^freernuts:
Kudos Ms. McMahon for simply saying, "Yup, ya got me." That's true debate and political "sportsmanship."
She didn't say "Yep, you got me" she said "No comment." That's a huge cop out, not an honest concession of defeat.

Whoa whoa whoa. I am in no way supporting either candidate, but we all wonder why our government is struggling when it's run by unqualified "celebrities." However, I totally respect a politician accepting defeat in a debate.

Why are politicians immune to criticism? Is it because they represent a MUCH larger party and their ill-planned agendas? Kudos Ms. McMahon for simply saying, "Yup, ya got me." That's true debate and political "sportsmanship."

Now, let's move on to the next topic...

@1:16 Water bottle stole my board!