Yeah it's old...but totally interesting.

Microsoft Access database lol!

changed from what, then? The majority of the energy it had was vertical, from gravity's effects on it. The momentum would have SLOWED as the towers fell, not matched the speed of gravity - not for an INSTANT!

So tell me Mr. Magician - how can you bring each tower down in about ten seconds without using explosives of some form?

Some life - arguing/voting down others about subjects you don't know anything about.

If I'm a science "amateur," who do you consider to be professionals? Please note - I am a physicist.

My challenge stands. Newtonian physics is 10th grade level physics at best. If it'd take too much of your glorious "life" in order to complete my challenge, then maybe you should go back to high school.

As for your challenge, here is where I spend 75% of my time: http://xxx.lanl.gov



In reply to your comment:
“Sorry, dude - I try to have a life.
Here's a challenge for you:
Read something other than crap on 9/11 conspiracy websites from science amateurs like yourself.

In reply to your comment:
“Here's a challenge for you: Prove that the WTC COULD have collapsed using Newtonian physics and provide your dissertation.

Here is a very good Creative Commons book on Newtonian physics. Use this or any other book on Newtonian physics you know, and tell me how the towers could have collapsed in the time they did. Use any video or written documentation you choose as a record of the time those towers took to fall.
””

Here's a challenge for you: Prove that the WTC COULD have collapsed using Newtonian physics and provide your dissertation.

Here is a very good Creative Commons book on Newtonian physics. Use this or any other book on Newtonian physics you know, and tell me how the towers could have collapsed in the time they did. Use any video or written documentation you choose as a record of the time those towers took to fall.

slight extension of this one - http://www.videosift.com/video/Jon-Stewart-on-Bill-Moyers-Journal

possible dupe, I'll discard if others agree...otherwise, I think the parts added are quite valuable.

*discard because it's going to be discarded anyway lol

fixed

The guy who did the original satire has a really good vid on recommendations for Ron Paul supporters. May post that some day, but you can see it by going to the in-response-to from this vid.

Keep discussing my character, theo...

...really validates the evidence of your conspiracy theory.

(p.s. - you might want to pick up a physics book to refute me, factually - preferably one on AT LEAST Newtonian physics, but if you'd like, I can prove my claims as far as structural engineering and design, so you might want to pick up a couple of books on those as well. Heck, I recommend you start with G. Spencer Brown's Laws of Form and read from there to the whitepapers released by Andrew M. Steane.)

As Einstein has proven - Energy can NOT be created or destroyed. The energy that was acting on the top floors HAD ALWAYS ACTED ON THEM(potential energy). When the top floors gave way(because of the supposed fires from the plane crash) - sure, they would fall - won't argue about that one - their POTENTIAL energy from gravity acting on them gets converted to KINETIC energy and THE TOP FLOORS FALL(because ENERGY CAN NOT BE CREATED OR DESTROYED).

You have to remember - the bottom floors HAD ALWAYS RESISTED the "pressure applied" from the top floors for OVER 20 years up to that point!

Why, all of a sudden, would they provide NO resistance(and thus each building falls in LESS THAN a minute) to the top floors, on September 11th?

Do I need to tutor you in high school physics, my friend?

The collapse of the WTC Buildings 1, 2, and 7 couldn't have happened without the laws of physics being VASTLY skewed(at the very least), or without the assistance of some type of Thermite/explosive. Refute me on that.

yep

In reply to your comment:
“lol at "reasons to leave the US" playlist containing one item, "Lithuanian Honey Wrestling". So, i guess that playlist is complete now. Congratulations!”

that is NOT an exploitation, v1k1n6. It is in honor of the people that died that we SHOULD investigate. Would you not want to know who killed a friend that was murdered? Well, in this case - I, personally, had about 100 friends in the North Tower.

There is no exploitation in wanting to know how they really died.

How to build a 300 bit, 1 Giga-Operation Quantum Computer

Yep. That about passes the human race for calculable intelligence.

yepyep - video doesn't do this case justice.

A public demonstration of even just fundamental concepts associated with the WTC collapse(giving the "collapse theorists" a benefit of a doubt, even) - now THAT would be the most convincing, but only to those people that saw it firsthand.

Some experiments can be done by the average person, some can not - the question is - do we trust our scientific institutions enough to believe their results when they do go public with them?