Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Check your email for a verification code and enter it below.Don't close this box or you must fill out this form again.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Chilling view of massive Japanese industrial area
Thanks, fixed.
Lawrence O'Donnell - What Constitution says about treason
I never claimed he was wrong on all of his other points. I only claimed that his credibility was ruined by making much the same kind of error as the one he's ranting against. Attempting to prove his point about the meaning of "treason" by twisting the meaning of "traitor" to suit his argument does not bode well for his credibility. It calls into question the integrity of his entire message.
You're comparing logic to semantics.
Also being wrong on one point doesn't automatically make you wrong on all others, unless they are built upon that point as an axiom. In this case, none of them were.
Child's Toy Dubstep.
Holy smokes, I had this exact machine as a kid. Annoyed the hell out of my family with it before they destroyed it!
Lawrence O'Donnell - What Constitution says about treason
Unfortunately, O'Donnell's credibility here was flushed down the toilet as soon as he complained that Boehner "has called Ed Snowden a traitor". According to common use of the word traitor, as well as the dictionary, you don't need to be guilty of treason to be a traitor. M-W defines traitor as "1: one who betrays another's trust or is false to an obligation or duty, 2: one who commits treason" How could anyone deny that Snowden has betrayed another's trust? Of course, WHOSE trust he betrayed and WHY is of critical importance (but not mentioned here).
So yeah, O'Donnell is correct when he points out that anyone who says Snowden is guilty of treason is not paying attention to the facts. But how is he himself any better when he applies this criticism equally to "treason" and "traitor"?
In case it wasn't clear, I'm not defending Boehner or the government. To the contrary - I wish O'Donnell and others like him would make more solid arguments. This one feels unnecessarily desperate/reaching and may serve to undermine his cause more than it helps it. (Could that have been his intent?)
Star Trek TNG Season 3 Gag Reel
*dead
The Internet: A warning from 50 years in the future
*yawn*
Honest Trailers - Skyfall
Quantum of Solace underrated? Hahahahaha!!!
Seth McFarlane Ridicules James Bond In His 1st Oscars Promo
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaken,_not_stirred#Purpose_of_shaking
Shocking Declassified Docs
What the heck happened to the panning in the audio for this... Gives a not so good feeling when listened to with headphones.
The Adventures of Kim Jong Un: Kim Jong Un vs. Psy
The credits made it worth it. Just barely. Maybe.
The Science of "Morning Wood"
This is one quality thread right here.
Assassination attempt During Pauline Marois Victory Speech
Interpreter: Well, ok... that's like, your opinion, man....
Julian Assange Hit Piece In New York Times
The New York Times stealth-edited their article to remove all of the objectionable content, apparently.
http://observer.com/2012/08/new-york-times-article-on-julian-assange-asylum-scrubs-its-toilet-reference/
HP Offers 'That Cloud Thing Everyone Is Talking About'
It's all very simple. Any time you see "cloud" or "cloud computing", simply substitute "some server(s) somewhere". If it's "The Cloud", you may instead use "Some Server(s) Somewhere on the Internet".
For some people, the term carries the added notion of somewhat intelligent/automated scalability in terms of capability and possibly billing. However, this is rarely explained to anyone as it's much too complex for techno-peons to comprehend.
The Cloud. Truly a buzzword for the ages.
This Cover of Radiohead Song "Creep" is Amazing!!!
omg she turned it into country ...
Pretty good aside from that, although it's a bit unfortunate she chose one of Radiohead's worst and overplayed songs. So much better stuff from their old days.
Here's a more impressive amateur rendition of Radiohead IMO:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXUnvQJFzHU