You've presented a thoughtful and considerate reply, DerHasisttot. Thank you.

The most basic argument I have presented is the erosion and eventual fading out of a particular population, and this is the crux of what I would like to focus on. The premise can be applied to any element of biodiversity.

The metaphor of an endangered species of duck is still apt.

My assumption was correct in that you, as most people, would find justification for mobilizing efforts in ensuring this particular population is given a chance to exist. For whatever reason, you have deemed this species of duck worth your concern and you do not hesitate to voice your consternation. Another assumption I will make is that the same can be said of any population that contributes to the precious diversity of our world and faces existential challenges. Whether it be a rare beetle, some exotic bush or the giant panda.

I like to think a noble feature of humanity is our desire for fairness and that we should not stand by while something is endangered. We both probably share this in common.

The above considered, I plead that because a particular civilization finds itself below replacement level it is in a perilous state and merits attention. This is a conclusion that, again, assumes an overreaching, unfettered respect for diversity.

Just as you should care for a particular duck, it would not negate your concern for other types of mallards, waterfowl or any other species. Your sense of justice would be shared equally.

You must extend your own desire to protect a unique given species to the right of a nation to maintain its own identifying characteristics. Realize that the desire for prosperity and sustained existence of a nation does not by definition mandate the impingement on another.

If you can not grasp this sympathy you display for a bird and apply it to another context, you are intellectually dishonest.

On the other hand, if like GenjiKilpatrick you harbour a sense that "whites" deserve to be eradicated because of who they are... you're barely human.

I'm not the one who even brought race into this discussion.. what are you both on about. I suspect you are projecting personal deep-seated insecurities onto someone else.

At any rate, thank you for demonstrating that when liberals are faced with information that doesn't fit their caricatural view of the world they go off into an infinite spiderweb of tangents.

"Racist" is nothing more than silly name-calling. Its only effect is making the accuser seem unoriginal and intellectually lazy. Congratulations to anyone who uses that word for employing the debating tactics of a five year old.

Before Breivik's name was out there I expressed caution in not blaming anyone for the attacks. Unlike most media sources who immediately suspected Muslim involvement, I waited for more facts to emerge before making assumptions. That is not the action of a "racist" as you would define one.

Further, it is impossible to condone the recent events in Norway, nor would any sensible person defend these assassinations as a reasonable act. My admission is that his reasoning is sound, his concerns legitimate and his motivations worthy of study.

As for DerHasisttot's logical pretzel. I'm sure he is the type of fellow that would mobilize government in defense of an endangered species of duck, but yet finds the mild concept that a civilization wishes to maintain its existence is morally wrong. Shame on him.

I'm sure you guys are smart enough to understand basic math, so here you go:

Population group A has a lower than replacement level reproduction rate.

Population group B has a higher than replacement level reproduction rate and benefits from an unlimited external source of replenishment.

The outcome is that over time, group A will cease to exist.

As it happens, some individuals in group A may be displeased about their upcoming extinction.

I agree almost fully with his points.

Pity his actions will set back the New Right.

No details have yet emerged, but it is statistically likely that there is foreign influence involved. If so, the Norwegians have brought this upon themselves.

Let's hope this one will wake us up.
>> ^Smugglarn:

YAY CULTURAL RELATIVISM!
HOORAY FOR MULTICULTURALISM!

Song is Doctor P's Big Boss

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmCe3fg7B4w

Tune with similar notes from Rusko: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7lVG9RqU1E

Whites are the only people crazy enough to get into this stuff.

Up next.. 56 year old Mohamed and his 6 year old bride Aisha!

Er.. probably not.

Rofl one foreigner is doing more for Nepal than 30 million Nepalese.

The man is a Mestizo because Hispanics looks like this: http://videosift.com/video/Carving-the-Mountains

As for messenger: your complacency is precisely why the West is spiralling into a nonentity.

I'll throw in the same argument as above: if you have lived in Korea for 25 years and failed to learn the language, would you consider yourself Korean? Would you have the gall to go before a government body and provide testimony that you expect more be done for "your people" in English or French?

I'm pretty sure if both you folks had lived in Mexico or any other country for a quarter century you'd have the decency to address people in the language of the land. And if you were illiterate I'm sure you wouldn't clamour on about stuff that is owed to you.

This Mestizo's insolence is insulting, but we are the fools who permitted and encouraged his insularization.

Most unlikely combination of channels ever.

Thank you for the information, jubuttib!

Sorry to be the one to tell you that you seem to know even less about the world than you thought: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/True_Finns#Parliamentary_election_2011
>> ^shuac:

If this were to happen in Finland or something, THEN I'd say "wow wow and double wow." But, to quote the parking garage attendant from Ferris Bueller's Day Off, what country do you think this is?